Connect with us

News & Analysis

The Constitution of Kenya on Natural Resource Management and MNCs

Published

on

By Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD (Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Policy Advisor, Natural Resources Lawyer and Dispute Resolution Expert from Kenya), Winner of Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021*

Kenya is well endowed with diverse natural resources including non-metallic minerals such as geothermal resources, soda ash, fluorspar, with the latest boosting coming from the petroleum oil discovered in Turkana. Its entrance into the extractive industries is expected to generate fiscal revenues, foreign exchange earnings and surpluses to finance much needed socio-economic development in the country. Most of the players involved in the extractive industries are multinational companies. It is expected that these corporations are to operate in accordance with the principles of governance outlined in Article 10 of the Constitution and this includes the principle of sustainable development.

Further, these entities are also to take into consideration the principle of social justice. In this regard, these entities are to ensure that the benefits accruing from the exploration of these resources are equitably shared with the members of the communities amongst whom they operate. The benefits to be shared are usually either in monetary or non-monetary form. Kenya is also in the process of formulating the Natural Resources (Benefit Sharing) Act which seeks to establish a system of benefit sharing in resource exploitation between resource exploiters, the national government, county governments and local communities and; to establish the Natural Resources Benefits Sharing Authority.

Benefit sharing agreements are to be entered into between the corporations seeking to conduct exploration activities with the respective counties. The corporations involved in the extraction activities are not only supposed to focus on maximising profits, but also impact positively on the lives of the communities amongst whom they operate. Corporate Social Responsibility is, thus, an important tool that can be used by MNCs as a business tool to promote a positive image to business stakeholders, and as a way to improve the quality of life among citizens of the host countries. However, the work of MNCs must go beyond CSR and be sustainable in the long run, as CSR in most cases is largely philanthropic and not anchored in law.

In carrying out their functions, the various MNCs are to ensure that they operate in a manner that is sustainable. They are to ensure that their activities are socially sustainable, environmentally sustainable and economically sustainable. These three pillars of sustainability were identified by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future, to be inextricably linked and deserving attention by all stakeholders. The emergence and popularization of sustainable development, has led to concerted efforts by players in the private sector to integrate sustainability in their activities and operations. Further, the principle has been the subject of judicial interpretation as was the in Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagyoros Project (Hungary v Slovakia) where Judge Weeremantry, argued that the concept of sustainable development reaffirms that there must be both development and environmental protection, and that neither of these rights can be neglected at the expense of the other, thus making it part of modern international law.

Various initiatives driven at ensuring sustainability have thus been undertaken by players in the private sector. The banking industry has particularly played a key role in this and this was particularly seen in 2003 when private banks adopted the Equator Principles which enable banks to evaluate the social and environmental impacts of their actions and the risks potentially posed by projects which they finance. In addition to this, the UN Global Compact initiative was also established in 2000 with the aim of having ‘a more sustainable and inclusive global economy.’ All these initiatives have been adopted on order to curb the ill associated with the activities of MNCs. It is, however, important that the sustainability models adopted by MNCs be able to meet the needs of the countries where they operate.

MNCs must be mindful of how they identify, define and prioritise their sustainability agenda. In this regard, these entities are supposed to ensure that they take into consideration the various sustainability challenges in order to ensure that the initiatives are successful and that they do not lead to further marginalization of certain groups. Due to the infrastructural and financial (in) capacity of the country, Kenya could only work with MNCs to achieve its dream of joining oil producing countries, and in this case Tullow Oil, amongst others were contracted to carry out the work. It is hoped that Kenya and the local people will benefit from this discovery.

However, the resource curse phenomenon is very real and Kenya must not follow the steps of other countries around Africa and the world where natural resources, particularly hydrocarbons have resulted in environmental degradation and violent conflicts, ultimately leading to impoverishment and devastation of the lives of the locals. It has been rightly pointed out that governance issues such as weak environmental policy, resource utilization policy and fiscal policies has come to be viewed as key factors inhibiting the ability of countries to use revenues from their extractive industries for development. The Constitution of Kenya 2010 has provisions that seek to guide the operations of various entities in the country, including MNCs.

Firstly, the Constitution in Article 10(1) provides for national values and principles of governance which are to bind all State organs, State officers, public officers and all persons, including legal persons. The principle of sustainable development is particularly of importance in Kenya. Related to this principle are the principles of intragenerational equity and that of intergenerational equity. The former has been defined in Section 2 of EMCA to mean that all people within the present generation have the right to benefit equally from exploitation of the environment, and that they have an equal entitlement to a clean and healthy environment. The principle of intergenerational equity, on the other hand, asserts that all generations hold the natural environment of our planet in common with other species, people, and with past, present and future generations.

In Kenya, the two principles have received constitutional recognition in Article 60(1) which provides for the principles of land holding, stating that land in the country is to be held in a manner that is inter alia equitable, efficient, productive and sustainable. The government has a mandate of ensuring that investments made on land benefit members of the community and Parliament is mandated to enact legislation ensuring that investment in property benefits local communities and their economies. In this regard, mechanisms are supposed to be put in place to ensure that there is benefitsharing with the local communities. The Constitution further seeks to ensure that entities or persons who are not citizens, including MNCs, are to hold land for a limited period of time (99 years) and that they are only to hold land under leasehold tenure. This is meant to ensure sustainable land utilisation and that the leases are able to take future land needs into consideration.

Article 42 further provides for the right to a clean and healthy environment which includes the right to have the environment protected for the benefit of present and future generations. The government is to undertake legislative measures to ensure the protection of the environment and ensure communities are able to benefit from the activities undertaken in their environments. Further, the Constitution creates an obligation on all persons to cooperate with State organs and other persons to protect and conserve the environment and ensure ecologically sustainable development and use of natural resources. A ‘person’ has been defined in the Constitution to include a company, association or other body of persons whether incorporated or unincorporated. In this regard, the MNCs are also under an obligation to ensure the protection and respect of the environment. These corporations can also be held liable for the violation of human rights as the provisions of the Bill of Rights binds State organs and persons.

The Constitution requires Parliament to enact legislation to: ensure that communities receive compensation or royalties for the use of their cultures and cultural heritage; and recognize and protect the ownership of indigenous seeds and plant varieties, their genetic and diverse characteristics and their use by the communities of Kenya. Noteworthy are the obligations of the State regarding the environment. The Constitution outlines them as including the obligation to, inter alia: ensure sustainable exploitation, utilisation, management and conservation of the environment and natural resources, and ensure the equitable sharing of the accruing benefits; work to achieve and maintain a tree cover of at least ten per cent of the land area of Kenya; protect and enhance intellectual property in, and indigenous knowledge of, biodiversity and the genetic resources of the communities and; encourage public participation in the management, protection and conservation of the environment..

The Constitution also provides that a transaction is subject to ratification by Parliament if it involves the grant of a right or concession by or on behalf of any person, including the national government, to another person for the exploitation of any natural resource of Kenya; and is entered into on or after the effective date. The foregoing constitutional provisions lay a basis for other legislation to be enacted in the country to govern investments by MNCs in the country. However, the Regulation of multinational companies operating in Kenya, as is the case in the rest of developing countries, still presents difficulties especially with regard to extractive industries.

*This is article is an extract from an article by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD,Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards): Muigua, K., “Multinational Corporations, Investment and Natural Resource Management in Kenya,” http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Multinational-Corporations-Investment-and-Natural-Resource-Management-in-Kenya-Kariuki-Muigua-November-2018.pdf. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is Kenya’s foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a Senior Lecturer of Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law and The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP). He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Dr. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Africa Trustee of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates. Dr. Muigua is recognized as one of the leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts by the Chambers Global Guide 2021. 

References

Africa Europe Faith & Justice Network (AEFJN), The Plundering of Africa’s Natural Resources, available at http://www.aefjn.org/tl_files/aefjnfiles/publications/Fact%20Sheets%20EN/120521-NatResources-Factsheet-eng.pdf [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

Ako, R. & Uddin, N., ‘Good governance and resources management in Africa,’ in Botchway, F. (ed), Natural Resource Investment and Africa’s Development, (Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2011), p. 25.

Asiedu, E., ‘Foreign direct investment, natural resources and institutions,’ Working Paper, March 2013, p. 2.

Batware, B., ‘Resource Conflicts: The Role of Multinational Corporations in the Democratic Republic of Congo,’ (MA Peace and Conflict Studies, EPU, 2011), available at http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/RoleofMultinationalCorporations.pdf [Accessed on 16/11/2018 ].

Constitution of Kenya, laws of Kenya, Government Printer, Nairobi.

Convention On Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, Preamble. 47 Dec. 18, 1997, 37 I.L.M. 1 (1998), adopted At Paris On November 21, 1997, by a Conference Held Under The Auspices Of The Organization For Economic Cooperation And Development (OECD). Convention Signed In Paris on December 17, 1997, By the United States and 32 other Nations, adopted by the Negotiating Conference on 21 November, 1997.

Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya ICSID Case No. ARB/15/29.

Cronin, R., et al, (eds), ‘Exploiting Natural Resources: Growth, Instability, and Conflict in the Middle East and Asia,’ Natural Resources and the Development-Environment Dilemma, 2009, p. 72.

Deva, S., “Human Rights Violations by Multinational Corporations and International Law: Where from Here?” Connecticut Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, 2003, pp. 1-57.

Duce, M. & Espana, B., ‘Definitions of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): a methodological note,’ available at http://bis.hasbeenforeclosed.com/publ/cgfs22bde3.pdf [Accessed 16/11/2018].

Ezekiel, A., “The application of international criminal law to resource exploitation: Ituri, Democratic Republic of the Congo,” Natural Resources Journal (2007): 225-245.

Helleiner, G.K., “The role of multinational corporations in the less developed countries’ trade in technology,” World Development 3, no. 4 (1975): 161-189.

H.M Revenue & Customs, INTM412040-Transfer pricing: legislation: rules: the arm’s length principle, available at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/intmanual/intm412040.htm [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

Johannes, E.M., Zulu, L.C. and Kalipeni, E., “Oil discovery in Turkana County, Kenya: a source of conflict or development?” African Geographical Review 34, no. 2 (2015): 142-164;

Kariuki, F., ‘Sustainability in the Financial Sector in Kenya,’ Kenya Bankers Association, WPS/01/15. 67 Hungary v Slovakia, 1997, WL 1168556 ICJ.

Kojima, K., ‘A Macroeconomic Approach to Direct Foreign Investment,’ Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, June 1973, 3.

Langdon, S., “Multinational corporations, taste transfer and underdevelopment: A case study from Kenya,” Review of African Political Economy 2, no. 2 (1975): 12-35.

Mello, R., ‘Foreign direct investment-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data,’ Oxford Economic Papers, No. 51, pp.133-151, p. 135, (Oxford University Press, 1999).

Muigua, K. & Kariuki, F., ‘Sustainable Development and Equity in the Kenyan Context’ UNLJ, Vol. 7(1), 2012.

Mkutu Agade, K., “‘Ungoverned Space’and the Oil Find in Turkana, Kenya.” The Round Table 103, no. 5 (2014): 497-515.

Neumayer, E., Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Trade and Development: Issues and Policy Options Concerning Compliance and Enforcement, A report for the Consumer Unity & Trust Society Jaipur, India, available at http://www.lse.ac.uk/geographyandenvironment/whoswho/profiles/ neumayer/pdf/cuts.pdf[Access ed on 16/11/2018].

Obati, G.O. & Owuor, G., ‘Extractive Industries, Natural Resources Management and Sustainable Development: a Review’, August, 2010, p. 1, available at www.sap4africa.net/…/EI_NRM_and_Sustainable_Development_August [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 27, June, 2000.

OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (usually referred to as the OECD Model Treaty or Model Convention).

OECD (2010), OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations 2010, OECD Publishing, available at http://www.oecdilibrary.org/taxation/oecd-transfer-pricing-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-and-taxadministrations-2010_tpg-2010-en [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

Patey, L., “Kenya–An African oil upstart in transition.” (2014). Available at https://ora.ox.ac.uk/catalog/ uuid:5abd035d-5f6a-4d53-8f5b5adef249c31b/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=WPM53. pdf&type_of_work=Working+paper [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

Patrick, S.M., “Why Natural Resources Are a Curse on Developing Countries and How to Fix It.” Available at The Atlantic. < http://www. theatlantic. com/international/archive/2012/04/whynaturalresources-are-a-curse-on-developing-countries-and-how-to-fix-it/256508/>, [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

Pérez, R.T., “Structural Problems and Changes in Cuba’s Economic Model,” In No More Free Lunch, pp. 5-22. Springer, Cham, 2014.

Pimpa, N., ‘Multinational Corporations: Corporate Social Responsibility and Poverty Alleviation in Thailand,’ School of Management, RMIT University.

Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R., ‘Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility,’ Harvard Business Review, December, 2006.

Richardon, B., ‘Africa: from object to agent of socially responsible investment’ in Francis Botchway, F. (ed), Natural Resource Investment and Africa’s Development (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2011).

Stiglitz, J., “Resource Rich, Cash Poor.” Slate, August 12 (2012). Available at https://slate.com/business/2012/08/why-resource-rich-countries-usually-end-uppoor.html [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

TRIPS Agreement, Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, signed in Marrakesh, Morocco on 15 April 1994.

United Nations Expert Group Meeting on ‘Natural Resources and Conflict in Africa: Transforming a Peace Liability into a Peace Asset,’ Conference Report, 17-19 June 2006, Cairo, Egypt. Organized by the Office of the Special Adviser on Africa (OSAA) in cooperation with the Government of Egypt.

United Nations Global Compact, Background: UN Global Compact and Leaders Summit 2013, About The UN Global Compact, available at http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/about_the_gc/UNGC_Leaders_Summit2013_Fact%20She et.pdf [Accessed on 16/11/2018].

News & Analysis

Former KCB Company Secretary Sues Over Unlawful Dismissal

Published

on

By

Former KCB Group Company Secretary Joseph Kamau Kania who has sued the Bank for Unlawful Dismissal

Former KCB Group Company Secretary Joseph Kamau Kania has sued the lender seeking reinstatement or be compensated for illegal sacking almost three years ago. Lawyer Kania was the KCB Group company secretary until restructuring of the lender in 2021 that saw some senior executives dropped.

Through the firm of Senior Counsel Wilfred Nderitu, Kamau wants the court to order KCB Group to unconditionally reinstate him to employment without altering any of the contractual terms until his retirement in December 2025.

In his court documents filed before Employment and Labour Relations Court, the career law banker seeks the court to declare the reorganization of the company structure a nullity and amounted to a violation of his fundamental right to fair labour practices as guaranteed in Article 41(1) of the Constitution. He further wants the court to declare that the position of Group Company Secretary did not at any time cease to exist within the KCB Group structure.

He further urged the Employment Court to declare that the recruitment and appointment of Bonnie Okumu, his former assistant, as the Group Company Secretary, in relation to the contemporaneous termination of his employment, was unprocedural, insufficient and inappropriate to infer a lawful termination of his employment.

“A declaration that the factual and legal circumstances of the Petitioner’s termination of employment were insufficient and inappropriate to infer a redundancy against him, and that any redundancy declared by the KCB Group in relation to him was therefore null, void and of no legal effect and amounted to a violation of his fundamental right to fair labour practices as guaranteed in Article 41(1) of the Constitution,” seeks lawyer Kamau.

Kamau says he was subjected to discriminatory practices by the KCB Bank Group in violation of his fundamental right to equality and freedom from discrimination as guaranteed in Article 27 of the Constitution and the termination of his employment was unfair, unjustified, illegal, null and void.

Lawyer Kamau further seeks the court to declare that the Non-Compete Clause in the 2016 Contract is unenforceable by the KCB Group as against him and is voidable by him as against the Bank ab initio, byreason of the termination of the Petitioner’s employment having been a violation of Articles 41(1) and 47(1) and (2) of the Constitution, and of the Employment Act.

He also wants the Employment Court to find that finding that KCB’s group legal representation by Messrs of Mohammed Muigai LLP Advocates law firm in respect of his claim for unlawful termination of employment resulted in a clear conflict of interest by reason of the fact that a Founding and Senior Partner at the said firm lawyer Mohammed Nyaoga is also the Chairman of the CBK’s Board of Directors.

“A Declaration that the circumstances of KCB’s legal representation by Messrs. Mohammed Muigai LLP Advocates resulted in a violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental right to have the employment dispute decided independently and impartially, as guaranteed in Article 50(1) of the Constitution,” seeks lawyer Kamau.

Kamau is seeking damages against both KCB Group and Central Bank of Kenya jointly and severally for the violation of his constitutional and fundamental right to fair labour practices.

He wants  further wants court to declare that CBK is liable to petitioner on account of its breach of statutory duty to effectively regulate KCB Group to ensure that KCB complied with the Central Bank of Kenya Prudential Guidelines and all other Laws, Rules, Codes and Standards, and that, as an issuer of securities, it complied with capital markets legislation.

Kamau through his lawyer Nderitu told the court that he was involved in Shareholder engagement in introducing the Group aide-mémoire that significantly improved the management of the Annual General Meetings, including obtaining approval without voting through the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Kenya Commercial Bank Limited among others.

He said that during his employment at KCB Bank Kenya and with the KCB Group, he initially worked well with former KCB CEO Joseph Oigara until 2016 when the CEO allegedly started sidelining him by removing the legal function from his reporting line.

He further claims he was transferred from the Group’s offices at Kencom House to its offices Upper Hill under the guise that the Petitioner was merely to support the KCB Group Board.

He adds that at that point his roles were given to Okumu for reasons that were not related to work demands.  He stated that Oigara at one time proposed that he should leave his role in the KCB Group and go and serve as the Company Secretary of the National Bank of Kenya Limited, a subsidiary of the Group, a suggestion which he disagreed with to Oigara’s utter annoyance.

Kamau stated that his work was thenceforth unfairly discredited, leading to his being taken through a disciplinary process whose intended outcome failed miserably, and the Petitioner was vindicated.

“More specifically, the Petitioner contends that the purported creation of a new organizational structure towards the end of 2020 was in fact Oigara’s orchestration targeted to remove certain individuals by requiring them to undergo interviews in the pretext that new roles were created, and amounted to a further violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental right to fair labour practices under Article 41(1) of the Constitution,” said in his court documents.

He further adds that this sham reorganization demonstrates how the role of the KCB Group Company Secretary purportedly ceased to be and was then very briefly replaced with a new role of the KCB Group General Counsel. The role of KCB Group Company Secretary then ‘resurfaced’ immediately thereafter, in total violation of legal and regulatory requirements.

Continue Reading

News & Analysis

Court of Appeal Upholds Eviction of Radcliffes from Karen Land

Published

on

By

Adrian Radcliffe, the Expatriate Squatter, Evicted from Karen Property by Innocent Purchaser for Value

The Court of Appeal has stayed the decision of the Environment and Land Court purporting to reinstate Adrian Radcliffe into possession of the 5.7 Acre Karen Land by Kena Properties Ltd after eviction by the lawful owners in February 2022. Adrian Radcliffe who was evicted by Kena Properties Ltd, the innocent purchaser of the Land for value.

Before his eviction, Mr. Radcliffe had been living on the land as a squatter expatriate for 33 years without paying any rent. Since he moved into the property as a tenant, he only paid deposit for the land in August 1989 despite corresponding severally with the owner of the land. His attempt to acquire the land by adverse possession claim filed in 2005 was dismissed by Court in 2011 on the basis that he has engaged with the owner of the land July 1997 and agreed to buy the land which he failed to do. The High Court [Justice Kalpana Rawal as she then was] concluded that:

“His [Mr. Adrian Radcliffe] averments that he did not have any idea of the whereabouts of the Defendant and that he could possibly be not alive, were not only very sad but mala fide in view of the correspondence on record addressed by him to the Defendant’s wife. I would thus find that the averments made by him to the contrary are untrue looking to the facts of this case.”

On 10th March 2022, Mr. Adrian Radcliffe and Family purported to obtain court orders for reinstatement into the land. However, the Court of Appeal issued an interim stay of execution of the said orders. The Court of Appeal has now granted the application of Kena Properties Ltd and stayed the execution of the Environment and Land Court Order pending the hearing and determination of the Appeal.

The Court also stayed the proceedings at the Environment and Land Court on the matter during the pendency of the Appeal. In effect, the eviction orders issued by the Chief Magistrate Court for eviction of Mr. Adrian Radcliffe in favour of Kena Properties as the purchaser of the property for value were upheld and the company now enjoys unfettered ownership and possession of the suit property until the conclusion of the Appeal.

The Court of Appeal in granting the orders sought by Kena Properties Ltd concurred with Kena Properties Ltd that as the property owner it had an arguable appeal with a high probability of success which would be rendered nugatory if Adrian Radcliffe a trespasser was to resume his unlawful possession of the suit property, erect structures thereon, recklessly use or abuse the said suit property as he deems fit. In any case, that is bound to fundamentally alter the state of the suit property and render it unusable by Kena Properties Ltd as the property owner.

At the same time, the Appellate Court rubbished the argument of Adrian Radcliffe in opposition to the application for stay that he has been in occupation of the suit property for more than 30 years and that he and his family were unlawfully evicted from the suit property on 4th February, 2022. The Court also rejected Radcliffe’s claim that Kena Properties Ltd has no valid title to the suit property and held that as the purchaser, the company was entitled to enjoy ownership and possession of their property during the pendency of the appeal.

The Court dismissed claims of Mr. Adrian Radcliffe that Kena Properties Ltd as the property owner acquired title to the suit property illegally and unprocedurally finding to the contrary. Further, it rejected Adrian Radcliffe’s claim that Kena Properties as the purchaser cannot evict a legal occupier of a property putting paid to the claim that he was a legal occupier at the time of eviction.

As a matter of fact, Mr. Adrian Radcliffe cannot claim to be the legal occupier of the property having attempted to acquire it by adverse possession before the High Court thwarted his fraudulent scheme on 28th February 2011. Mr. Radcliffe did not appeal the 2011 High Court decision meaning it is still the law that he is not the owner of the land nor the legal occupier of the land having attempted to adversely acquire against the interests of the lawful owner who sold it to Kena Properties.

Mr. Adrian Radcliffe is a well-to-do Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WaSH) UNICEF consultant and former UN employee (who has been earning hefty House Allowance). Many have wondered why he has been defaulting in paying rent for 33 years on the prime plot of land in Karen while living large and taking his kids to most expensive schools in Kenya. No question, a local Kenyan could never have gotten away with such selfish impunity.

Continue Reading

News & Analysis

Review: Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 9, No. 1

Published

on

By

The Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Volume 9, Issue No. 1, which is edited by and published by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD is out and stays true to the reputation of the journal in providing a platform for scholarly debate on thematic areas in the fields of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development. The current issue published in September 2022 covers diverse topics including Resolving Oil and Gas Disputes in Africa; National Environment Tribunal, Sustainable Development and Access to Justice in Kenya; Protection of Cultural Heritage During War; The Role of Water in the attainment of Sustainable Development in Kenya; Property Rights in Human Biological Materials in Kenya; Nurturing our Wetlands for Biodiversity Conservation; Investor-State Dispute Resolution in a Fast-Paced World; Status of Participation of Women in Mediation; Business of Climate Change and Critical Analysis of World Trade Organization’s Most-Favored Nation (MFN) Treatment.

Dr. Wilfred A. Mutubwa and Eunice Njeri Ng’ang’a in “Resolving Oil and Gas Disputes in an Integrating Africa: An Appraisal of the Role of Regional Arbitration Centres” explore the nature of disputes in the realm of oil and gas in Africa taking a look into the recent continental and sub-regional developments in a bid to establish regional integration. Additionally, it tests the limits of intra-African trade and dispute resolution and the imperatives for the African regional courts and arbitration centres. In “National Environment Tribunal, Sustainable Development and Access to Justice in Kenya,” Dr. Kariuki Muigua discusses the role played by the National Environment Tribunal (NET) in promoting access to justice and enhancing the principles of sustainable development in Kenya. The paper also highlights challenges facing the tribunal and proposes recommendations towards enhancing the effectiveness of the tribunal.

Dr. Kenneth Wyne Mutuma in “Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of War: A Case for History,” argues that cultural heritage is at the heart of human existence and its preservation even in times of war is sacrosanct. It concludes that it is thus critical for states to take positive and tangible steps to ensure environmental conservation and protection during war within the ambit of the existing international legal framework. In “The Role of Water in the attainment of Sustainable Development in Kenya,” Jack Shivugu critically evaluates the role of water in the attainment of sustainable development in Kenya and argues water plays a critical role in the attainment of the sustainable development goals both in Kenya and at the global stage. The paper interrogates some of the water and Sustainable Development concerns in Kenya including water pollution, water scarcity and climate change and suggests practical ways to enhance the role of water in the Sustainable Development agenda.

Dr. Paul Ogendi in “Collective Property Rights in Human Biological Materials in Kenya,” reflects on property rights in relation to human biological materials obtained from research participants participating in genomic research. He argues that property rights are crucial in genomic research because they can help avoid exploitation or abuse of such precious material by researchers. In “Nurturing our Wetlands for Biodiversity Conservation,” Dr. Kariuki Muigua notes that Wetlands have a vital role in not just delivering ecological services to meet human needs, but also in biodiversity conservation. Wetlands are vital habitat sites for many species and a source of water, both of which contribute to biodiversity protection. The paper examines the role of wetlands in biodiversity conservation and how these wetland resources might be managed to improve biodiversity conservation.

Oseko Louis D. Obure in “Investor-State Dispute Resolution in a Fast-Paced World,” preponderance of disputes between States or States and Investors created need for a robust, effective, and efficient mechanisms not only for the resolution of these disputes but also their prevention. He notes that developing states lead in being parties to Investor-State Disputes (ISD) particularly as respondents. He proceeds to conceptualize and problematize investor-state disputes resolution in a fast-paced world. Lilian N.S. Kong’ani and Dr. Kariuki Muigua in “Status of Participation of Women in Mediation: A case Study of Development Project Conflict in Olkaria IV, Kenya” review the status of participation of women in mediation to resolve conflicts between KenGen and the community. The paper demonstrates a need for further democratization of the mediation processes to cater for more participation of women to enhance the mediation results and offer more sustainable resolutions.

Felix Otieno Odhiambo and Melinda Lorenda Mueni in “The Business of Climate Change: An Analysis of Carbon Trading in Kenya analyses the business of carbon trading in the context of Kenya’s legal framework. The article examines the legal framework that underpins climate change into the Kenyan legal system and provides an exposition of the concept of carbon trading and its various forms. Michael Okello, in “Critical Analysis of World Trade Organisation’s Most-Favored Nation (MFN) Treatment: Prospects, Challenges and Emerging Trends in the 21st Century,” highlights the rationale behind MFN treatment and also restates the vision of multilateral trade to achieve equitable and special interventions with respect to trade in goods, services and trade related intellectual property rights in the affected states.

Continue Reading

Trending