Connect with us

News & Analysis

Role of Courts, Tribunals and public in Environmental Management in Kenya



By Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD (Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Policy Advisor, Natural Resources Lawyer and Dispute Resolution Expert from Kenya), Winner of Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021, ADR Publication of the Year 2021 and CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021*

Courts play an important role in environmental management in Kenya through the promotion and protection of environmental rights. The Constitution provides the framework for enforcement of environmental rights through an application to court.  On such an application, a court may grant appropriate remedies including an order to prevent, stop or discontinue an act or omission that is harmful to the environment or provide compensation to a victim of violation of the right to a clean and healthy environment. Courts and tribunals including the Environment and Land Court and the National Environment Tribunal have facilitated this role through developing environmental jurisprudence and promoting the principles of sustainable development.

In Peter K. Waweru v Republic, the court while upholding the principles of sustainable development equated the right to a clean and healthy environment with the right to life and held that: ‘We have added the dictionary meaning of life which gives life a wider meaning including its attachment to the environment. Thus a development that threatens life is not sustainable and ought to be halted. In environmental law life must have this expanded meaning as a matter of necessity.’

In Save Lamu & 5 others v National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) & Another, the National Environment Tribunal while setting aside the decision by the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) to issue an EIA Licence held as follows: ‘The purpose of the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) process is to assist a country in attaining sustainable development when commissioning projects. The United Nations has set Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action by all countries recognizing that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests.’

This demonstrates that national courts and tribunals are essential in environmental management in Kenya through development of environmental jurisprudence and promoting the principles of sustainable development. However, this role can be hindered by factors such as case load, costs of litigation, delays and procedural technicalities which continue to affect the judicial system in Kenya.

The Rio Declaration provides that environmental issues are best handled with the participation of all concerned citizens, at the relevant level. In Kenya, public participation is a key aspect of environmental and natural resources management. It allows persons who are likely to be affected by environmental laws, policies and projects within their localities to express their views for consideration in implementation of such laws, policies and projects. Public participation has been enshrined as one of the national values and principles under the Constitution. The Constitution further obligates the state to encourage public participation in the management, protection and conservation of the environment.

The role of public participation environmental management was succinctly captured in Patrick Musimba v National Land Commission & 4 others, where it was held that: ‘We have no doubt that the State under Article 69 of the Constitution is enjoined to ensure sustainable development: see also the Preamble to the Constitution. The State is also to ensure that every person has a right to a clean and healthy environment. However physical development must also be allowed to foster to ensure that the other guaranteed rights and freedoms are also achieved. Such physical development must however be undertaken within a constitutional and statutory framework to ensure that the environment thrives and survives. It is for such reason that the Constitution provides for public participation in the management, protection and conservation of the environment.’

Public participation is an essential tool of environmental management in Kenya which ensures that the views of the public are taken into account in environmental decision making. However, public participation in environmental decision making raises certain concerns such as the quality and extent of participation and the need to ensure that it is not enough for people to participate but there is need for them to be able to appreciate the real implications of any decision being made. Without this, public participation is reduced to a matter of formality without any real benefit or achieving the desired end.

Fiscal Incentives in form of rewards can extended to business players as a way of encouraging them to adopt measures that help in preserving the environment while discarding or avoiding those that contribute to the degradation of the environment. They take several forms including tax/fiscal measures. EMCA provides for tax and other fiscal incentives, disincentives or fees as may be proposed by the government to induce or promote the proper management of the environment and natural resources or the prevention or abatement of environmental degradation.

Under the Act, such tax and fiscal incentives, disincentives or fees may include customs and excise waiver in respect of imported capital goods which prevent or substantially reduce environmental degradation caused by an undertaking and tax rebates to industries or other establishments that invest in plants, equipment and machinery for pollution control, recycling of wastes, water harvesting and conservation, prevention of floods and for using other energy resources as substitutes for hydrocarbons. However, one of the shortcomings of incentive based mechanisms is that they do not fit every problem hence not widely used in environmental protection. Further, there may be bureaucratic obstacles to the successful use of incentives such as difficulties of the economic calculations involved.

It has also been asserted that economic and judicial methods cannot solve environmental challenges on their own with a call of appeal to human beings’ limitless internal ethical resources in the quest for environmental conservation. Environmental ethics is aimed at providing ethical justification and moral motivation for the cause of global environmental protection. This calls for adoption of an appropriate attitude towards nature and establishment of an ethical relationship between human beings and nature in order to foster environmental conservation. However, environmental ethics is yet to be fully embraced in Kenya as evidenced by numerous cases of environmental pollution perpetrated by human beings.

Further, environmental degradation has been attributed to among other factors, poverty and low levels of education. Provision of education is therefore a crucial step towards elimination of bad environmental practices. Education has the ability to empower people and give them alternative means of making a living as opposed to relying on the environment for their sustainability. Further education has the ability to enhance sustainable development by improving the capacity of citizens to address environmental and developmental issues. If empowered through education, citizens are able to make environmentally sound decisions in matters relating to exploitation of natural resources, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and those having a bearing on the environment.

*This is article is an extract from an article by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya): Muigua, K., Utilising Science and Technology for Environmental Management in Kenya, Dr. Kariuki Muigua is Kenya’s foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a Senior Lecturer of Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law and The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP). He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Dr. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Africa Trustee of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates. Dr. Muigua is recognized as one of the leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts by the Chambers Global Guide 2021. 


Ali.M., Model of Green Technology Adaptation in Small and Medium –Sized Tannery Industry, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12 (4), 2017.

Andre. F., Firms and the Environment: Ethics or Incentives? Corporate Social Responsibility Series, (Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2005).

Huesemann. M.H., ‘Can Pollution Problems Be Effectively Solved by Environmental Science and Technology? An Analysis of Critical Limitations, Ecological Economics, Volume 37, Issue 2, May 2001, pg 271-287.

Human Rights Dimension of Covid-19 Response, available at human-rights-dimensions-covid-19-response (accessed on 03/04/2020).

Hsiang Kung. W., The Role of Science in Environmental Protection: Is the Development of Environmental Law Toward More Protective and Productive Way, or Distorted to Inequality, Through the Involvement of Science? Available at: (accessed on 18/03/2020).

Juma. C., ‘Exponential Innovation and Human Rights: Implications for Science and Technology Diplomacy’, Science, Technology and Globalization, February, 2018.

Kamau. J., How Nairobi River Lost Pollution Battle, Daily Nation, Monday, August 19, 2019 65 De Luca. P et al, Industrial Waste Treatment by ETS-10 Ion Exchanger Material, available at 11/11/2316 (accessed on 28/03/2020).

Kenton. W., Green Tech, available at (accessed on 29/03/2020).

Kenya News Agency, New Push on Green Technologies, available at, accessed on 29/03/2020.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry, National Climate Change Action Plan 2018-2022, available at (accessed on 31/03/2020).

Moore. J.W et al, Towards Linking Environmental Law and Science, available at (accessed on 01/04/2020).

Muigua.K., Reconceptualising the Right to a Clean and Healthy Environment in Kenya, available at (accessed on 04/04/2020).

Muigua. K., Nurturing Our Environment for Sustainable Development, Glenwood Publishers Limited, 2016.

Muigua. K., Wamukoya. D., & Kariuki. F., ‘Natural Resources and Environmental Justice in Kenya’ Glenwood Publishers Limited, 2015.

Muigua. K., ‘The Role of Courts in Safeguarding Environmental Rights in Kenya: A Critical Appraisal’ available at Environmental-Rights-in-Kenya-A-Critical-Appraisal-Kariuki-Muigua-17th-January-2019-1.pdf (accessed on 19/03/2020).

Muigua. K., Towards Meaningful Public Participation in Natural Resource Management in Kenya, available at (accessed on 01/04/2020).

National Assembly Departmental Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, Report on an Inquiry into Complaints of Environmental Pollution, available at default/files/2019-09/LDK%20REPORT_compressed.pdf, accessed on 28/03/2020.

National Environment Management Authority, 2 years on: Say no to plastic bags, available at (Accessed on 20/03/2020).

National Environment Management Authority, ‘The National Solid Waste Management Strategy’, available at Solid%20 Waste%20 Management%20Strategy%20.pdf, accessed on 28/03/2020.

National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Factories Closed, Owners Arrested for Polluting Environment, available at &id=298: factories-closedowners-arrested-for-polluting-environment&catid=10:news-and-events& Itemi d=454 (accessed on 06/04/2020).

National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Green Initiatives in Kenya, available at (accessed on 29/03/2020).

National Environment Management Authority, Ban on Manufacture, Importation, Supply, Distribution and use of Plastic Carrier Bags in Kenya, available at _content&view=article&id=296&catid=2&Itemid=451 (accessed on 29/03/2020).

Nichols. M.R., ‘How Technology Can Save the Environment’ available at https://born2 articles/technology-save-environment/ (accessed on 03/04/2020).

Owusu. P.A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie. S, A Review of Renewable Energy Sources, Sustainability Issues and Climate Change Mitigation, available at 2016. 1167990?needAccess=true (accessed on 30/03/2020).

Peter K. Waweru v Republic, Misc. Civil Application No. 118 of 2004, (2006) eKLR

Save Lamu & 5 others v National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) & Another, Tribunal Appeal No. NET 196 of 2016, (2019) eKLR.

Srinivas. H., ‘Introduction: Technology and Environment’ available at introduction.html (accessed on 18/03/2020).

Voulvoulis.N., & Burgman.M.A., The Contrasting Roles of Science and Technology in Environmental Challenges, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 49, 2019, Issue 12.

UNESCO, ‘Educating for a Sustainable Future: A Transdisciplinary Vision for Concerted Action’ available at (accessed on 03/04/2020).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris Agreement, 2015, available at f (accessed on 30/03/2020).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), United Nations, 1992, available at (accessed on 30/03/2020).

Yang, T., Towards an Egalitarian Global Environmental Ethics, Environmental Ethics and International Policy, available at (accessed on 03/04/2020).


News & Analysis

Former KCB Company Secretary Sues Over Unlawful Dismissal




Former KCB Group Company Secretary Joseph Kamau Kania who has sued the Bank for Unlawful Dismissal

Former KCB Group Company Secretary Joseph Kamau Kania has sued the lender seeking reinstatement or be compensated for illegal sacking almost three years ago. Lawyer Kania was the KCB Group company secretary until restructuring of the lender in 2021 that saw some senior executives dropped.

Through the firm of Senior Counsel Wilfred Nderitu, Kamau wants the court to order KCB Group to unconditionally reinstate him to employment without altering any of the contractual terms until his retirement in December 2025.

In his court documents filed before Employment and Labour Relations Court, the career law banker seeks the court to declare the reorganization of the company structure a nullity and amounted to a violation of his fundamental right to fair labour practices as guaranteed in Article 41(1) of the Constitution. He further wants the court to declare that the position of Group Company Secretary did not at any time cease to exist within the KCB Group structure.

He further urged the Employment Court to declare that the recruitment and appointment of Bonnie Okumu, his former assistant, as the Group Company Secretary, in relation to the contemporaneous termination of his employment, was unprocedural, insufficient and inappropriate to infer a lawful termination of his employment.

“A declaration that the factual and legal circumstances of the Petitioner’s termination of employment were insufficient and inappropriate to infer a redundancy against him, and that any redundancy declared by the KCB Group in relation to him was therefore null, void and of no legal effect and amounted to a violation of his fundamental right to fair labour practices as guaranteed in Article 41(1) of the Constitution,” seeks lawyer Kamau.

Kamau says he was subjected to discriminatory practices by the KCB Bank Group in violation of his fundamental right to equality and freedom from discrimination as guaranteed in Article 27 of the Constitution and the termination of his employment was unfair, unjustified, illegal, null and void.

Lawyer Kamau further seeks the court to declare that the Non-Compete Clause in the 2016 Contract is unenforceable by the KCB Group as against him and is voidable by him as against the Bank ab initio, byreason of the termination of the Petitioner’s employment having been a violation of Articles 41(1) and 47(1) and (2) of the Constitution, and of the Employment Act.

He also wants the Employment Court to find that finding that KCB’s group legal representation by Messrs of Mohammed Muigai LLP Advocates law firm in respect of his claim for unlawful termination of employment resulted in a clear conflict of interest by reason of the fact that a Founding and Senior Partner at the said firm lawyer Mohammed Nyaoga is also the Chairman of the CBK’s Board of Directors.

“A Declaration that the circumstances of KCB’s legal representation by Messrs. Mohammed Muigai LLP Advocates resulted in a violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental right to have the employment dispute decided independently and impartially, as guaranteed in Article 50(1) of the Constitution,” seeks lawyer Kamau.

Kamau is seeking damages against both KCB Group and Central Bank of Kenya jointly and severally for the violation of his constitutional and fundamental right to fair labour practices.

He wants  further wants court to declare that CBK is liable to petitioner on account of its breach of statutory duty to effectively regulate KCB Group to ensure that KCB complied with the Central Bank of Kenya Prudential Guidelines and all other Laws, Rules, Codes and Standards, and that, as an issuer of securities, it complied with capital markets legislation.

Kamau through his lawyer Nderitu told the court that he was involved in Shareholder engagement in introducing the Group aide-mémoire that significantly improved the management of the Annual General Meetings, including obtaining approval without voting through the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Kenya Commercial Bank Limited among others.

He said that during his employment at KCB Bank Kenya and with the KCB Group, he initially worked well with former KCB CEO Joseph Oigara until 2016 when the CEO allegedly started sidelining him by removing the legal function from his reporting line.

He further claims he was transferred from the Group’s offices at Kencom House to its offices Upper Hill under the guise that the Petitioner was merely to support the KCB Group Board.

He adds that at that point his roles were given to Okumu for reasons that were not related to work demands.  He stated that Oigara at one time proposed that he should leave his role in the KCB Group and go and serve as the Company Secretary of the National Bank of Kenya Limited, a subsidiary of the Group, a suggestion which he disagreed with to Oigara’s utter annoyance.

Kamau stated that his work was thenceforth unfairly discredited, leading to his being taken through a disciplinary process whose intended outcome failed miserably, and the Petitioner was vindicated.

“More specifically, the Petitioner contends that the purported creation of a new organizational structure towards the end of 2020 was in fact Oigara’s orchestration targeted to remove certain individuals by requiring them to undergo interviews in the pretext that new roles were created, and amounted to a further violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental right to fair labour practices under Article 41(1) of the Constitution,” said in his court documents.

He further adds that this sham reorganization demonstrates how the role of the KCB Group Company Secretary purportedly ceased to be and was then very briefly replaced with a new role of the KCB Group General Counsel. The role of KCB Group Company Secretary then ‘resurfaced’ immediately thereafter, in total violation of legal and regulatory requirements.

Continue Reading

News & Analysis

Court of Appeal Upholds Eviction of Radcliffes from Karen Land




Adrian Radcliffe, the Expatriate Squatter, Evicted from Karen Property by Innocent Purchaser for Value

The Court of Appeal has stayed the decision of the Environment and Land Court purporting to reinstate Adrian Radcliffe into possession of the 5.7 Acre Karen Land by Kena Properties Ltd after eviction by the lawful owners in February 2022. Adrian Radcliffe who was evicted by Kena Properties Ltd, the innocent purchaser of the Land for value.

Before his eviction, Mr. Radcliffe had been living on the land as a squatter expatriate for 33 years without paying any rent. Since he moved into the property as a tenant, he only paid deposit for the land in August 1989 despite corresponding severally with the owner of the land. His attempt to acquire the land by adverse possession claim filed in 2005 was dismissed by Court in 2011 on the basis that he has engaged with the owner of the land July 1997 and agreed to buy the land which he failed to do. The High Court [Justice Kalpana Rawal as she then was] concluded that:

“His [Mr. Adrian Radcliffe] averments that he did not have any idea of the whereabouts of the Defendant and that he could possibly be not alive, were not only very sad but mala fide in view of the correspondence on record addressed by him to the Defendant’s wife. I would thus find that the averments made by him to the contrary are untrue looking to the facts of this case.”

On 10th March 2022, Mr. Adrian Radcliffe and Family purported to obtain court orders for reinstatement into the land. However, the Court of Appeal issued an interim stay of execution of the said orders. The Court of Appeal has now granted the application of Kena Properties Ltd and stayed the execution of the Environment and Land Court Order pending the hearing and determination of the Appeal.

The Court also stayed the proceedings at the Environment and Land Court on the matter during the pendency of the Appeal. In effect, the eviction orders issued by the Chief Magistrate Court for eviction of Mr. Adrian Radcliffe in favour of Kena Properties as the purchaser of the property for value were upheld and the company now enjoys unfettered ownership and possession of the suit property until the conclusion of the Appeal.

The Court of Appeal in granting the orders sought by Kena Properties Ltd concurred with Kena Properties Ltd that as the property owner it had an arguable appeal with a high probability of success which would be rendered nugatory if Adrian Radcliffe a trespasser was to resume his unlawful possession of the suit property, erect structures thereon, recklessly use or abuse the said suit property as he deems fit. In any case, that is bound to fundamentally alter the state of the suit property and render it unusable by Kena Properties Ltd as the property owner.

At the same time, the Appellate Court rubbished the argument of Adrian Radcliffe in opposition to the application for stay that he has been in occupation of the suit property for more than 30 years and that he and his family were unlawfully evicted from the suit property on 4th February, 2022. The Court also rejected Radcliffe’s claim that Kena Properties Ltd has no valid title to the suit property and held that as the purchaser, the company was entitled to enjoy ownership and possession of their property during the pendency of the appeal.

The Court dismissed claims of Mr. Adrian Radcliffe that Kena Properties Ltd as the property owner acquired title to the suit property illegally and unprocedurally finding to the contrary. Further, it rejected Adrian Radcliffe’s claim that Kena Properties as the purchaser cannot evict a legal occupier of a property putting paid to the claim that he was a legal occupier at the time of eviction.

As a matter of fact, Mr. Adrian Radcliffe cannot claim to be the legal occupier of the property having attempted to acquire it by adverse possession before the High Court thwarted his fraudulent scheme on 28th February 2011. Mr. Radcliffe did not appeal the 2011 High Court decision meaning it is still the law that he is not the owner of the land nor the legal occupier of the land having attempted to adversely acquire against the interests of the lawful owner who sold it to Kena Properties.

Mr. Adrian Radcliffe is a well-to-do Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WaSH) UNICEF consultant and former UN employee (who has been earning hefty House Allowance). Many have wondered why he has been defaulting in paying rent for 33 years on the prime plot of land in Karen while living large and taking his kids to most expensive schools in Kenya. No question, a local Kenyan could never have gotten away with such selfish impunity.

Continue Reading

News & Analysis

Review: Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 9, No. 1




The Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Volume 9, Issue No. 1, which is edited by and published by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD is out and stays true to the reputation of the journal in providing a platform for scholarly debate on thematic areas in the fields of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development. The current issue published in September 2022 covers diverse topics including Resolving Oil and Gas Disputes in Africa; National Environment Tribunal, Sustainable Development and Access to Justice in Kenya; Protection of Cultural Heritage During War; The Role of Water in the attainment of Sustainable Development in Kenya; Property Rights in Human Biological Materials in Kenya; Nurturing our Wetlands for Biodiversity Conservation; Investor-State Dispute Resolution in a Fast-Paced World; Status of Participation of Women in Mediation; Business of Climate Change and Critical Analysis of World Trade Organization’s Most-Favored Nation (MFN) Treatment.

Dr. Wilfred A. Mutubwa and Eunice Njeri Ng’ang’a in “Resolving Oil and Gas Disputes in an Integrating Africa: An Appraisal of the Role of Regional Arbitration Centres” explore the nature of disputes in the realm of oil and gas in Africa taking a look into the recent continental and sub-regional developments in a bid to establish regional integration. Additionally, it tests the limits of intra-African trade and dispute resolution and the imperatives for the African regional courts and arbitration centres. In “National Environment Tribunal, Sustainable Development and Access to Justice in Kenya,” Dr. Kariuki Muigua discusses the role played by the National Environment Tribunal (NET) in promoting access to justice and enhancing the principles of sustainable development in Kenya. The paper also highlights challenges facing the tribunal and proposes recommendations towards enhancing the effectiveness of the tribunal.

Dr. Kenneth Wyne Mutuma in “Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of War: A Case for History,” argues that cultural heritage is at the heart of human existence and its preservation even in times of war is sacrosanct. It concludes that it is thus critical for states to take positive and tangible steps to ensure environmental conservation and protection during war within the ambit of the existing international legal framework. In “The Role of Water in the attainment of Sustainable Development in Kenya,” Jack Shivugu critically evaluates the role of water in the attainment of sustainable development in Kenya and argues water plays a critical role in the attainment of the sustainable development goals both in Kenya and at the global stage. The paper interrogates some of the water and Sustainable Development concerns in Kenya including water pollution, water scarcity and climate change and suggests practical ways to enhance the role of water in the Sustainable Development agenda.

Dr. Paul Ogendi in “Collective Property Rights in Human Biological Materials in Kenya,” reflects on property rights in relation to human biological materials obtained from research participants participating in genomic research. He argues that property rights are crucial in genomic research because they can help avoid exploitation or abuse of such precious material by researchers. In “Nurturing our Wetlands for Biodiversity Conservation,” Dr. Kariuki Muigua notes that Wetlands have a vital role in not just delivering ecological services to meet human needs, but also in biodiversity conservation. Wetlands are vital habitat sites for many species and a source of water, both of which contribute to biodiversity protection. The paper examines the role of wetlands in biodiversity conservation and how these wetland resources might be managed to improve biodiversity conservation.

Oseko Louis D. Obure in “Investor-State Dispute Resolution in a Fast-Paced World,” preponderance of disputes between States or States and Investors created need for a robust, effective, and efficient mechanisms not only for the resolution of these disputes but also their prevention. He notes that developing states lead in being parties to Investor-State Disputes (ISD) particularly as respondents. He proceeds to conceptualize and problematize investor-state disputes resolution in a fast-paced world. Lilian N.S. Kong’ani and Dr. Kariuki Muigua in “Status of Participation of Women in Mediation: A case Study of Development Project Conflict in Olkaria IV, Kenya” review the status of participation of women in mediation to resolve conflicts between KenGen and the community. The paper demonstrates a need for further democratization of the mediation processes to cater for more participation of women to enhance the mediation results and offer more sustainable resolutions.

Felix Otieno Odhiambo and Melinda Lorenda Mueni in “The Business of Climate Change: An Analysis of Carbon Trading in Kenya analyses the business of carbon trading in the context of Kenya’s legal framework. The article examines the legal framework that underpins climate change into the Kenyan legal system and provides an exposition of the concept of carbon trading and its various forms. Michael Okello, in “Critical Analysis of World Trade Organisation’s Most-Favored Nation (MFN) Treatment: Prospects, Challenges and Emerging Trends in the 21st Century,” highlights the rationale behind MFN treatment and also restates the vision of multilateral trade to achieve equitable and special interventions with respect to trade in goods, services and trade related intellectual property rights in the affected states.

Continue Reading