By Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD, Africa’s Leading Dispute Resolution and ESG Expert, Africa Arbitrator of the Year 2022/3, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022/3, Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by the Republic of Kenya, Member of the National Environment Tribunal, University of Nairobi Senior Lecturer and Managing Partner at Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates.*
Disputes related to climate change may increase in future due to: actions of commercial entities giving rise to groups or affected individuals having rights of action; climate change inaction – failure by states to take measures in response to climate change, giving rise to potential inter-state and investor-state disputes, and claims by groups of concerned citizens; climate change action– taking response measures, giving rise to potential inter-state and investor-state disputes; dilution or revocation of responsive measures by states, giving rise to potential renewable energy treaty arbitrations; commercial contract enforcement – private sector is central to climate change mitigation, and there may be an increase commercial contracts relating to climate change mitigation and adaptation; coming into effect of the Paris Agreement, which may give rise to arbitration.
While discussing the role of arbitration in addressing climate change disputes, some commentators have highlighted the following disputes: 1. cases brought to either mandate or change climate-related policy or conduct; 2. cases brought to seek financial redress for damages associated with the effects of climate change; 3. contractual disputes arising out of the industry transitions which the energy sector and all major industries are currently undergoing; 4. contractual disputes resulting from climate-related weather events; 5. related disputes between foreign investors and host states; and 6. related disputes between states, and between other transnational actors, while observing that a key reason for selecting these categories is that the potential role for arbitration varies significantly depending on the category of dispute, with arbitration having a greater role (in practice and in potential) in categories 3 to 6.
Notably, Kenya’s Environment and Land Court Act, 2011 provides for the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as including power to hear and determine disputes relating to climate issues. Also worth pointing out is the recognition of alternative means of dispute resolution and even affirming that where alternative dispute resolution mechanism is a condition precedent to any proceedings before the Court, the Court is mandated to stay proceedings until such condition is fulfilled. While it is to be acknowledged that the judges appointed to head environment and land courts are appointed on the basis of having relevant knowledge in the area, it must also be acknowledged that they may not always be well versed with all matters that come before them. It is during such times, either on court’s own motion, with the agreement of or at the request of the parties, that the court may consider any other appropriate means of alternative dispute resolution including arbitration especially in respect of technical issues relating to climate change disputes.
The provisions of Climate Change Act 2016 acknowledge the role of courts in upholding rights relating to climate change and spells out the role of the court in the following words: “a person may, pursuant to Article 70 of the Constitution, apply to the Environment and Land Court, alleging that a person has acted in a manner that has or is likely to adversely affect efforts towards mitigation and adaptation to the effects of climate change”. In such applications, the court may make an order or give directions to: prevent, stop or discontinue an act or omission that is harmful to the environment; compel a public officer to take measures to prevent or discontinue an act or omission that is harmful to the environment; or provide compensation to a victim of a violation relating to climate change duties.
While this is a commendable step towards empowering local courts in discharging their mandate in promotion of sustainable development, parties may not always be both citizens of Kenya and where the violating party is a foreign investor, there may be need to invoke international commercial or investment arbitration. In addition, it must be noted that parties may invoke section 20 (2) of the Environment and Land Court Act 2011 which provides that ‘where alternative dispute resolution mechanism is a condition precedent to any proceedings before the Court, the Court shall stay proceedings until such condition is fulfilled’. Such parties may opt to have the dispute settled by expert arbitrators in the area of climate change disputes and only go back to court for declaratory rights and enforcement of the outcome(s).
The advantages of arbitration make it a viable alternative way of managing climate change related disputes as against litigation, while still ensuring that the outcome thereof can be enforced. Parties, even where they already filed a case before a court, may not always be willing to let out commercial secrets and may, therefore, wish to refer the matter to arbitration, court-annexed or otherwise. Given the distinction between conflicts and disputes, it is important to analyze any disagreements that are attributable to climate change in a bid to decide the most viable mechanism of addressing them. Such analysis and management of disputes may require expertise in that particular area of law, namely environmental law and climate change. This is where arbitration becomes useful because, as already pointed out, parties in arbitration proceedings are allowed to pick the third party expert with the relevant experience and knowledge to help them settle the particular aspects of the dispute.
This is an extract from Kenya’s First ESG Law Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) by Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution, Senior Advocate of Kenya, Chartered Arbitrator, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya), African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, Member of National Environment Tribunal (NET) Emeritus (2017 to 2023) and Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by Republic of Kenya and Academic Champion of ADR 2024. Prof. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Prof. Kariuki Muigua teaches Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law, The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP) and Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies. He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Prof. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates and Africa Trustee Emeritus of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2019-2022. Prof. Muigua is a 2023 recipient of President of the Republic of Kenya Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) Award for his service to the Nation as a Distinguished Expert, Academic and Scholar in Dispute Resolution and recognized among the top 5 leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts in Band 1 in Kenya by the Chambers Global Guide 2024 and was listed in the Inaugural THE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame 2023 as one of the Top 50 Most Distinguished Litigation Lawyers in Kenya and the Top Arbitrator in Kenya in 2023.
References
Dervis, K., “Devastating for the World’s Poor Climate Change Threatens the Development Gains Already Achieved,” UN Chronicle Online Edition < https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/undp30.pdf> accessed 6 April 2022.
‘COP26 Goals’ (UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) at the SEC – Glasgow 2021) accessed 5 April 2022.
Vally Koubi, ‘Climate Change and Conflict’ (2019) 22 Annual Review of Political Science 343 accessed 11 April 2022.
Marshall Burke, Solomon M Hsiang and Edward Miguel, ‘Climate and Conflict’ (2015) 7 Annual Review of Economics 577, 578 accessed 27 March 2022.
- Segerson, Environment, in Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics Volume 3, 2013.
Climate Change Act, No. 11 of 2016, Laws of Kenya.
UN General Assembly, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly, 20 January 1994, A/RES/48/189.
UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1.
- Mark Baker, Cara Dowling, Dylan McKimmie, Tamlyn Mills, Kevin O’Gorman, Holly Stebbing, Martin Valasek, “What are climate change and sustainability disputes? Key arbitration examples (Part 1 contractual disputes)”, in James Rogers, London; Cara Dowling, Vancouver (eds), International arbitration report, Norton Rose Fulbright – Issue 16 – June 2021, p. 40. < https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/- /media/files/nrf/nrfweb/publications/international-arbitration-report-issue16.pdf?revision=40c8a703-6e1d-413c-8c7e-ac1201697383&revision=40c8a703-6e1d-413c8c7e-ac1201697383> accessed 30 March 2022.
Froese, Rebecca, and Janpeter Schilling, “The Nexus of Climate Change, Land Use, and Conflicts.” (2019).
‘Tackling the Intersecting Challenges of Climate Change, Fragility and Conflict’ accessed 30 March 2022.
Arild Vatn, Environmental Governance: Institutions, Policies and Actions (Paperback edition, Edward Elgar Publishing 2016) 2.
Corissajoy, ‘Settlement, Resolution, Management, and Transformation: An Explanation of Terms’ (Beyond Intractability, 29 June 2016) accessed 6 April 2022.
- Muigua, Resolving conflicts through mediation in Kenya, Glenwood Publishers, Nairobi, 2nd Ed., 2017.
Bloomfield, D., “Towards Complementarity in Conflict Management: Resolution and Settlement in Northern Ireland”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol.32, No. 2 (May, 1995), pp.152-153.
Fetherston, A.B., “From Conflict Resolution to Transformative Peacebuilding: Reflections from Croatia”, Centre for Conflict Resolution-Department of Peace Studies: Working Paper 4 (April, 2000), pp. 2-4.
Serge, L, et al, “Conflict Management Processes for Land-related conflict”, A Consultancy Report by the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, available at www.forumsec.org, [Accessed on 04/06/2012].
Cloke, K., “The Culture of Mediation: Settlement vs. Resolution”, The Conflict Resolution Information Source, Version IV, December 2005.
Fenn, P., “Introduction to Civil and Commercial Mediation”, in Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Workbook on Mediation, (CIArb, London, 2002), pp.12-13.
Barnstein, R. The Handbook of Arbitration Practice: General Principles (Part 2) (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1998), p. 313.
‘Resolving Climate Change Disputes through Arbitration’ (Pinsent Masons) accessed 7 April 2022.
- Mark Baker, Cara Dowling, Dylan McKimmie, Tamlyn Mills, Kevin O’Gorman, Holly Stebbing, Martin Valasek, “What are climate change and sustainability disputes? Key arbitration examples (Part 1 contractual disputes)”, in James Rogers, London; Cara Dowling, Vancouver (eds), International arbitration report, Norton Rose Fulbright – Issue 16 – June 2021, p. 41.
‘Resolving Climate Change Disputes through Arbitration’ (Pinsent Masons) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Environmental Dispute Resolution’ (Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2022) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Environmental Dispute Resolution’ (PCA Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to the Environment and/or Natural Resources, 2001) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Arbitrating climate change disputes | Actualités | DLA Piper Global Law Firm’ (DLA Piper) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘ICC Arbitration and ADR Commission Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC – International Chamber of Commerce) accessed 11 April 2022.
Grafakos, S., Pacteau, C., Delgado, M., Landauer, M., Lucon, O., and Driscoll, P. (2018), “Integrating mitigation and adaptation: Opportunities and challenges,” In Rosenzweig, C., W. Solecki, P. Romero-Lankao, S. Mehrotra, S. Dhakal, and S. Ali Ibrahim (eds.), Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge University Press, New York. 101–138, 102 < https://uccrn.ei.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/pubs/ARC3.2- PDF-Chapter-4-Mitigation-and-Adaptation-wecompress.com_.pdf> accessed 7 April 2022.
‘Does Climate Change Cause Conflict?’ (IGC, 2 June 2021) accessed 6 April 2022.
‘Arbitration in Africa | White & Case LLP’ accessed 4 April 2022.
‘LSE Law Review Blog’ accessed 11 April 2022.
‘15.1: Global Climate Change’ (Geosciences LibreTexts, 26 December 2019) accessed 20 March 2022.
UNESCO, ‘Climate Change Raises Conflict Concerns’ (UNESCO, 29 March 2018) accessed 11 April 2022.