By Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, C.Arb, FCIArb is a Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution at the University of Nairobi, Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration, Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Respected Sustainable Development Policy Advisor, Top Natural Resources Lawyer, Highly-Regarded Dispute Resolution Expert and Awardee of the Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) of Kenya by H.E. the President of Republic of Kenya. He is the Academic Champion of ADR 2024, the African ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, the African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, ADR Practitioner of the Year in Kenya 2021, CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 and ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and Author of the Kenya’s First ESG Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) and Kenya’s First Two Climate Change Law Book: Combating Climate Change for Sustainability (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023), Achieving Climate Justice for Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023) and Promoting Rule of Law for Sustainable Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, January 2024)*
The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has been noted as a regular forum for dispute resolution under bilateral and multilateral treaties, contracts, and other instruments relating to natural resources and the environment, and provides specialized rules for arbitration and conciliation of these disputes. Notably, PCA already has in place the PCA Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to the Environment and/or Natural Resources (“Environmental Rules”), adopted in 2001, and the Rules are applicable where all parties have agreed in writing that a dispute that may arise or that has arisen between them shall be referred to arbitration under the Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment.
It is also worth noting that the PCA Environmental Rules provide for the establishment of a specialized list of arbitrators considered to have expertise in this area, establishment of a list of scientific and technical experts who may be appointed as expert witnesses pursuant to these Rules, and parties to a dispute are free to choose arbitrators, conciliators and expert witnesses from these Panels but with the understanding that the choice of arbitrators, conciliators or experts is not limited to the PCA Panels.
As a way of supporting and building capacity of States, States, international organizations, and private parties involved in the creation and administration of new, specialized environmental dispute settlement procedures can seek guidance and support from the PCA. This is possible considering that the PCA is responsible for resolving disputes between States and non-State players that arise through a variety of bilateral and multilateral investment treaties, contracts, and other instruments.
Just like PCA has special rules for arbitration of environmental and natural resource related disputes, there may be a need, going forward, for both domestic and international institutions (both courts and arbitral institutions) to build capacity in terms of expertise and legal framework in preparation for the climate change related disputes ranging from energy, finance and technology sectors, as follows: Energy – in particular, the transition away from fossil fuels to renewables, and the growth especially of the solar and wind sectors; Finance – carbon trading and green certificates; and Technology – the drive for efficient power grids, as well as low emission energy and data storage.
The other areas that may need special attention have already been identified by the International Chamber of Commerce Commission on Environment and Energy task force on “Arbitration of Climate Change Related Disputes” (the “Task Force”) in their 2019 Report titled Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR (the “Report”) where they observed that a number of specific features of international arbitration that may assist in resolving climate change related disputes going forward include utilization and optimization of: use of and recourse to appropriate scientific and other expertise; existing measures and procedures for expediting early resolution of disputes or providing urgent interim or conservatory relief; integration of climate change commitments and principles of international law, including arising out of the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement; enhanced transparency of proceedings; potential third-party participation, including through amicus curiae briefs; and costs, including advances and allocation of costs, to promote fair, transparent and appropriate conduct of climate change related disputes.
As already observed, Kenya’s Climate Change Act, 2016 does not make reference to the use of ADR mechanisms, including arbitration in addressing disputes that arise therefrom. However, it makes reference to Environment and Land Court Act 2011 (ELC Act) which empowers Environment and Land Court to hear and determine disputes relating to climate issues. The ELC Act, however, gives these courts the power to resort to ADR mechanisms.
There is a need for policy makers and other stakeholders to borrow a leaf from the PCA Environmental Rules and the recommendations from the 2019 ICC Task Force Report to consider coming up with special rules and panel of experts that may either address disputes requiring specialized knowledge such as those relating to climate change or those who may offer specialized guidance to courts while dealing with these disputes.
Arbitral institutions such as Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration, among others, should also not be left behind in building specialized capacity along the same lines. Climate change related disputes are unlikely to go away in the near future and stakeholders should, therefore, prepare adequately.
This is an extract from Kenya’s First ESG Law Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) by Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution, Senior Advocate of Kenya, Chartered Arbitrator, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya), African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, Member of National Environment Tribunal (NET) Emeritus (2017 to 2023) and Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by Republic of Kenya and Academic Champion of ADR 2024. Prof. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Prof. Kariuki Muigua teaches Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law, The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP) and Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies. He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Prof. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates and Africa Trustee Emeritus of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2019-2022. Prof. Muigua is a 2023 recipient of President of the Republic of Kenya Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) Award for his service to the Nation as a Distinguished Expert, Academic and Scholar in Dispute Resolution and recognized among the top 5 leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts in Band 1 in Kenya by the Chambers Global Guide 2024 and was listed in the Inaugural THE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame 2023 as one of the Top 50 Most Distinguished Litigation Lawyers in Kenya and the Top Arbitrator in Kenya in 2023.
References
Dervis, K., “Devastating for the World’s Poor Climate Change Threatens the Development Gains Already Achieved,” UN Chronicle Online Edition < https://www.uncclearn.org/wp-content/uploads/library/undp30.pdf> accessed 6 April 2022.
‘COP26 Goals’ (UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) at the SEC – Glasgow 2021) accessed 5 April 2022.
Vally Koubi, ‘Climate Change and Conflict’ (2019) 22 Annual Review of Political Science 343 accessed 11 April 2022.
Marshall Burke, Solomon M Hsiang and Edward Miguel, ‘Climate and Conflict’ (2015) 7 Annual Review of Economics 577, 578 accessed 27 March 2022.
Segerson, Environment, in Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics Volume 3, 2013.
Climate Change Act, No. 11 of 2016, Laws of Kenya.
UN General Assembly, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly, 20 January 1994, A/RES/48/189.
UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1.
Mark Baker, Cara Dowling, Dylan McKimmie, Tamlyn Mills, Kevin O’Gorman, Holly Stebbing, Martin Valasek, “What are climate change and sustainability disputes? Key arbitration examples (Part 1 contractual disputes)”, in James Rogers, London; Cara Dowling, Vancouver (eds), International arbitration report, Norton Rose Fulbright – Issue 16 – June 2021, p. 40. < https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/- /media/files/nrf/nrfweb/publications/international-arbitration-report-issue16.pdf?revision=40c8a703-6e1d-413c-8c7e-ac1201697383&revision=40c8a703-6e1d-413c8c7e-ac1201697383> accessed 30 March 2022.
Froese, Rebecca, and Janpeter Schilling, “The Nexus of Climate Change, Land Use, and Conflicts.” (2019).
‘Tackling the Intersecting Challenges of Climate Change, Fragility and Conflict’ accessed 30 March 2022.
Arild Vatn, Environmental Governance: Institutions, Policies and Actions (Paperback edition, Edward Elgar Publishing 2016) 2.
Corissajoy, ‘Settlement, Resolution, Management, and Transformation: An Explanation of Terms’ (Beyond Intractability, 29 June 2016) accessed 6 April 2022.
Muigua, Resolving conflicts through mediation in Kenya, Glenwood Publishers, Nairobi, 2nd Ed., 2017.
Bloomfield, D., “Towards Complementarity in Conflict Management: Resolution and Settlement in Northern Ireland”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol.32, No. 2 (May, 1995), pp.152-153.
Fetherston, A.B., “From Conflict Resolution to Transformative Peacebuilding: Reflections from Croatia”, Centre for Conflict Resolution-Department of Peace Studies: Working Paper 4 (April, 2000), pp. 2-4.
Serge, L, et al, “Conflict Management Processes for Land-related conflict”, A Consultancy Report by the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, available at www.forumsec.org, [Accessed on 04/06/2012].
Cloke, K., “The Culture of Mediation: Settlement vs. Resolution”, The Conflict Resolution Information Source, Version IV, December 2005.
Fenn, P., “Introduction to Civil and Commercial Mediation”, in Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Workbook on Mediation, (CIArb, London, 2002), pp.12-13.
Barnstein, R. The Handbook of Arbitration Practice: General Principles (Part 2) (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1998), p. 313.
‘Resolving Climate Change Disputes through Arbitration’ (Pinsent Masons) accessed 7 April 2022.
Mark Baker, Cara Dowling, Dylan McKimmie, Tamlyn Mills, Kevin O’Gorman, Holly Stebbing, Martin Valasek, “What are climate change and sustainability disputes? Key arbitration examples (Part 1 contractual disputes)”, in James Rogers, London; Cara Dowling, Vancouver (eds), International arbitration report, Norton Rose Fulbright – Issue 16 – June 2021, p. 41.
‘Resolving Climate Change Disputes through Arbitration’ (Pinsent Masons) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Environmental Dispute Resolution’ (Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2022) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Environmental Dispute Resolution’ (PCA Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to the Environment and/or Natural Resources, 2001) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Arbitrating climate change disputes | Actualités | DLA Piper Global Law Firm’ (DLA Piper) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘ICC Arbitration and ADR Commission Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC – International Chamber of Commerce) accessed 11 April 2022.
Grafakos, S., Pacteau, C., Delgado, M., Landauer, M., Lucon, O., and Driscoll, P. (2018), “Integrating mitigation and adaptation: Opportunities and challenges,” In Rosenzweig, C., W. Solecki, P. Romero-Lankao, S. Mehrotra, S. Dhakal, and S. Ali Ibrahim (eds.), Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge University Press, New York. 101–138, 102 < https://uccrn.ei.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/pubs/ARC3.2- PDF-Chapter-4-Mitigation-and-Adaptation-wecompress.com_.pdf> accessed 7 April 2022.
‘Does Climate Change Cause Conflict?’ (IGC, 2 June 2021) accessed 6 April 2022.
‘Arbitration in Africa | White & Case LLP’ accessed 4 April 2022.
‘LSE Law Review Blog’ accessed 11 April 2022.
‘15.1: Global Climate Change’ (Geosciences LibreTexts, 26 December 2019) accessed 20 March 2022.
UNESCO, ‘Climate Change Raises Conflict Concerns’ (UNESCO, 29 March 2018) accessed 11 April 2022.
ture of Mediation: Settlement vs. Resolution”, The Conflict Resolution Information Source, Version IV, December 2005.
Fenn, P., “Introduction to Civil and Commercial Mediation”, in Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Workbook on Mediation, (CIArb, London, 2002), pp.12-13.
Barnstein, R. The Handbook of Arbitration Practice: General Principles (Part 2) (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1998), p. 313.
‘Resolving Climate Change Disputes through Arbitration’ (Pinsent Masons) accessed 7 April 2022.
- Mark Baker, Cara Dowling, Dylan McKimmie, Tamlyn Mills, Kevin O’Gorman, Holly Stebbing, Martin Valasek, “What are climate change and sustainability disputes? Key arbitration examples (Part 1 contractual disputes)”, in James Rogers, London; Cara Dowling, Vancouver (eds), International arbitration report, Norton Rose Fulbright – Issue 16 – June 2021, p. 41.
‘Resolving Climate Change Disputes through Arbitration’ (Pinsent Masons) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Environmental Dispute Resolution’ (Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2022) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Environmental Dispute Resolution’ (PCA Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to the Environment and/or Natural Resources, 2001) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘Arbitrating climate change disputes | Actualités | DLA Piper Global Law Firm’ (DLA Piper) accessed 11 April 2022.
‘ICC Arbitration and ADR Commission Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC – International Chamber of Commerce) accessed 11 April 2022.
Grafakos, S., Pacteau, C., Delgado, M., Landauer, M., Lucon, O., and Driscoll, P. (2018), “Integrating mitigation and adaptation: Opportunities and challenges,” In Rosenzweig, C., W. Solecki, P. Romero-Lankao, S. Mehrotra, S. Dhakal, and S. Ali Ibrahim (eds.), Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge University Press, New York. 101–138, 102 < https://uccrn.ei.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/pubs/ARC3.2- PDF-Chapter-4-Mitigation-and-Adaptation-wecompress.com_.pdf> accessed 7 April 2022.
‘Does Climate Change Cause Conflict?’ (IGC, 2 June 2021) accessed 6 April 2022.
‘Arbitration in Africa | White & Case LLP’ accessed 4 April 2022.
‘LSE Law Review Blog’ accessed 11 April 2022.
‘15.1: Global Climate Change’ (Geosciences LibreTexts, 26 December 2019) accessed 20 March 2022.
UNESCO, ‘Climate Change Raises Conflict Concerns’ (UNESCO, 29 March 2018) accessed 11 April 2022.