News & Analysis
The Concept of Energy Justice and Why it is Important Today
By Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD (Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Natural Resources Lawyer and Dispute Resolution Expert in Kenya)*
Energy is increasingly being recognized as an essential human need. The importance of energy cannot be overemphasized. It is vital for economic development and poverty eradication in any given country as the driving force of human development. There is a growing evidence linking access to energy with the attainment of socioeconomic rights such as the right to education, right to food and the right to health. Reliable supply of electricity and adequate lighting can aid learners in their academic activities; further electricity can be utilized for farming activities such as irrigation. Indeed, it has been asserted that energy is “not just another commodity, but the precondition of all commodities, a basic factor equal with air and water.
Access to clean energy has been equated to a ‘golden thread’ which has the ability to stimulate development by connecting the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and unlocking sustainable economic growth. It has been pointed out that no country in the recent past has been able to substantially reduce poverty levels without an increase in energy services. The importance of energy has been given recognition at the global stage with Sustainable Development Goal number 7 being geared towards ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy. Energy is described as being central to every major opportunity and challenge that the world faces today as it connects with the other Sustainable Development Goals.
However, despite its importance, access to clean and affordable energy remains a challenge especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Studies have shown that in these countries, nearly 83% of the population depends on traditional fuels while 74% lack access to electricity thus contributing to energy poverty. Energy poverty in such countries is caused by a number of factors including low levels of electrification due to economic constraints and insufficient institutions. In Kenya, despite attempts by the government to enhance electricity connectivity through measures such as subsidizing the costs, many households especially in rural areas cannot afford the initial connection charges thus have low access. Further, the high costs of modern sources of energy such as Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) also contribute to energy poverty
This is despite the fact that massive investments have been channeled in the energy sector across the globe and particularly in Kenya. It is confounding that despite the efforts made in the energy sector, injustices are still prevalent in areas such as access to energy, energy costs and energy governance. The concept of energy justice is aimed at addressing such injustices. The inequalities witnessed in the energy sector has led to emergence of the concept of energy justice. Energy justice has been defined as a global energy system that fairly disseminates both the benefits and costs of energy services, and one that has representative and impartial energy decision-making.
Energy justice seeks to apply basic principles of justice and fairness to the inequalities witnessed in the availability, affordability, sustainability and due process in the energy sector. Energy justice seeks to influence decision making in the energy sector by incorporating justice and ethical considerations in such decisions; for example, disconnecting electricity for citizens who fail to pay their bills on time could affect their day to day lives yet failing to do so could overburden other paying citizens. In essence, energy justice addresses the justice and ethical dilemma of allocating the benefits of scarce energy resources among citizens and between the present and future generations.
As such, energy justice forms a crucial component of the sustainable development agenda and the principles of intra and inter- generational equity. These principles as enunciated in the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development are aimed at achieving development that equitably meets developmental and environmental needs of both the present and future generations. Through energy justice, affordability, sustainability and availability in the energy sector can be achieved thus promoting human and economic development.
There are three core tenets of energy justice; distributional justice, recognition justice and procedural justice. Distributional justice is aimed at establishing existing injustices in the energy sector and means of resolving them. It assesses issues such as uneven distribution, production and consumption of energy. The location of energy production facilities such as wind power stations, dams and gas power stations could create inequalities in access to energy thus raising justice concerns. Recognition justice is aimed at determining the section of the population ignored or misrepresented in energy access in order to cure such ills. Procedural justice is aimed at streamlining the decision making processes in the energy sector by engaging all stakeholder to ensure inclusivity non-discrimination. This is achieved through measures such as public participation and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in relation to energy projects. It has the ability to foster acceptance and ownership of such projects whilst promoting environmental conservation and sustainable development.
The aim of energy justice is to apply these three tenets in the energy policy and systems so as to enhance availability, affordability, sustainability and due process in the energy sector. The concept of energy justice is paramount in defining its energy future. This is especially critical for countries grappling with the challenge of how to enable a ‘just transition’ to lower carbon economy that simultaneously delivers energy poverty reduction and climate change resilience. While the importance of energy as a human need necessary for fostering human development is not in doubt, the inequalities are still witnessed in the energy sector globally in aspects such as energy access, energy costs and energy decision making, hence the need for energy justice.
Energy Justice has emerged as a global concept aimed at dealing with such inequalities witnessed in the energy sector. It is aimed at promoting distributional, recognition and procedural justice in the energy sector by ensuring equality, fairness, transparency, accountability, participation and energy security. For countries in the developing world to attain its development agenda, energy justice is of utmost importance due to the clear link between energy and development. There is no question that energy justice as an ideal is attainable. However, there is need for concerted effort by all stakeholders to move forward together towards energy justice in the quest for sustainable development.
*This is article is an extract from an article by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD, Muigua, K., Towards Energy Justice in Kenya, Available at: http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Towards-Energy-Justice-in-Kenya-00000005.pdf. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is Kenya’s foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a Senior Lecturer of Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law and The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP). He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Dr. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Africa Trustee of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates. Dr. Muigua is recognized as one of the leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts by the Chambers Global Guide 2021 and nominated as ADR Practitioner of the Year (Nairobi Legal Awards) 2021.
Bildirici. M & Ozaksoy.F., ‘Woody Biomass Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa’ Procedia Economics and Finance 38 (2016) 287 – 293.
Guruswamy. L, ‘Energy Justice and Sustainable Development’ Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Volume 21, No. 2.
Goldthau. A & Sovacool. B., ‘The Uniqueness of the Energy Security, Justice and Governance Problem’ Energy Policy, 41 (2012) 232-240.
Heffron. J.R., & McCauley. D., ‘The Concept of Energy Justice across the Disciplines’ Energy Policy 105 (2017) 658-667, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/12969 (Accessed on 22/11/2021).
Jenkins. K, et al, ‘Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review’ Energy Research & Social Science 11 (2016) 174- 182.
Muigua. K., ‘Access to Energy as a Constitutional Right in Kenya’, available at http://kmco.co.ke/wpcontent/uploads/2018/08/Access-to-Energy-as-a-Constitutional-Right-in-Kenya-NOVEMBER-2013.pdf (Accessed on 22/11/2021).
Newell. P. & Philips. J., ‘Neoliberal Energy Transitions in the South: Kenyan Experience’ Geoforum, 74 (2016) 39-48.
Njiru. C.W & Letema. S.C., ‘Energy Poverty and its Implication on Standard of Living in Kirinyaga, Kenya’ Journal of Energy, 2018, Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jen/2018/3196567/ (accessed on 22/11/2021).
Sovacool,B.K. & Dworkin, Global Energy Justice: Problems, Principles and Practices (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Sovacool. B.K., ‘Energy Decisions Reframed as Justice and Ethical Concerns’ Energy Justice 1, available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42579074.pdf (Accessed on 22/11/2021).
United Nations Development Programme, ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ available at https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html (Accessed on 23/01/2020).
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, ‘Goal No. 7: Ensure Access to Affordable, Reliable, Sustainable and Modern Energy’ available at https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/energy/ (accessed on 22/11/2021).
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’ 1992, Principles 3 and 4.
World Bank, ‘Sustainable Development Goal on Energy (SDG7) and the World Bank Group, available at https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/energy/brief/sustainable-development-goal-on-energy-sdg7-and-the-world-bank-group (Accessed on 22/11/2021).
Yoshida. T., & Zusman. E., ‘Achieving the Multiple Benefits of a Sustainable Development Goal for Energy’ Available at https://www.iges.or.jp/en/publication_documents/pub/bookchapter/en/4934/08_Ch8_ Achieving_ the_SDGs_.pdf (Accessed on 22/11/2021).
News & Analysis
Former KCB Company Secretary Sues Over Unlawful Dismissal
Former KCB Group Company Secretary Joseph Kamau Kania has sued the lender seeking reinstatement or be compensated for illegal sacking almost three years ago. Lawyer Kania was the KCB Group company secretary until restructuring of the lender in 2021 that saw some senior executives dropped.
Through the firm of Senior Counsel Wilfred Nderitu, Kamau wants the court to order KCB Group to unconditionally reinstate him to employment without altering any of the contractual terms until his retirement in December 2025.
In his court documents filed before Employment and Labour Relations Court, the career law banker seeks the court to declare the reorganization of the company structure a nullity and amounted to a violation of his fundamental right to fair labour practices as guaranteed in Article 41(1) of the Constitution. He further wants the court to declare that the position of Group Company Secretary did not at any time cease to exist within the KCB Group structure.
He further urged the Employment Court to declare that the recruitment and appointment of Bonnie Okumu, his former assistant, as the Group Company Secretary, in relation to the contemporaneous termination of his employment, was unprocedural, insufficient and inappropriate to infer a lawful termination of his employment.
“A declaration that the factual and legal circumstances of the Petitioner’s termination of employment were insufficient and inappropriate to infer a redundancy against him, and that any redundancy declared by the KCB Group in relation to him was therefore null, void and of no legal effect and amounted to a violation of his fundamental right to fair labour practices as guaranteed in Article 41(1) of the Constitution,” seeks lawyer Kamau.
Kamau says he was subjected to discriminatory practices by the KCB Bank Group in violation of his fundamental right to equality and freedom from discrimination as guaranteed in Article 27 of the Constitution and the termination of his employment was unfair, unjustified, illegal, null and void.
Lawyer Kamau further seeks the court to declare that the Non-Compete Clause in the 2016 Contract is unenforceable by the KCB Group as against him and is voidable by him as against the Bank ab initio, byreason of the termination of the Petitioner’s employment having been a violation of Articles 41(1) and 47(1) and (2) of the Constitution, and of the Employment Act.
He also wants the Employment Court to find that finding that KCB’s group legal representation by Messrs of Mohammed Muigai LLP Advocates law firm in respect of his claim for unlawful termination of employment resulted in a clear conflict of interest by reason of the fact that a Founding and Senior Partner at the said firm lawyer Mohammed Nyaoga is also the Chairman of the CBK’s Board of Directors.
“A Declaration that the circumstances of KCB’s legal representation by Messrs. Mohammed Muigai LLP Advocates resulted in a violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental right to have the employment dispute decided independently and impartially, as guaranteed in Article 50(1) of the Constitution,” seeks lawyer Kamau.
Kamau is seeking damages against both KCB Group and Central Bank of Kenya jointly and severally for the violation of his constitutional and fundamental right to fair labour practices.
He wants further wants court to declare that CBK is liable to petitioner on account of its breach of statutory duty to effectively regulate KCB Group to ensure that KCB complied with the Central Bank of Kenya Prudential Guidelines and all other Laws, Rules, Codes and Standards, and that, as an issuer of securities, it complied with capital markets legislation.
Kamau through his lawyer Nderitu told the court that he was involved in Shareholder engagement in introducing the Group aide-mémoire that significantly improved the management of the Annual General Meetings, including obtaining approval without voting through the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Kenya Commercial Bank Limited among others.
He said that during his employment at KCB Bank Kenya and with the KCB Group, he initially worked well with former KCB CEO Joseph Oigara until 2016 when the CEO allegedly started sidelining him by removing the legal function from his reporting line.
He further claims he was transferred from the Group’s offices at Kencom House to its offices Upper Hill under the guise that the Petitioner was merely to support the KCB Group Board.
He adds that at that point his roles were given to Okumu for reasons that were not related to work demands. He stated that Oigara at one time proposed that he should leave his role in the KCB Group and go and serve as the Company Secretary of the National Bank of Kenya Limited, a subsidiary of the Group, a suggestion which he disagreed with to Oigara’s utter annoyance.
Kamau stated that his work was thenceforth unfairly discredited, leading to his being taken through a disciplinary process whose intended outcome failed miserably, and the Petitioner was vindicated.
“More specifically, the Petitioner contends that the purported creation of a new organizational structure towards the end of 2020 was in fact Oigara’s orchestration targeted to remove certain individuals by requiring them to undergo interviews in the pretext that new roles were created, and amounted to a further violation of the Petitioner’s fundamental right to fair labour practices under Article 41(1) of the Constitution,” said in his court documents.
He further adds that this sham reorganization demonstrates how the role of the KCB Group Company Secretary purportedly ceased to be and was then very briefly replaced with a new role of the KCB Group General Counsel. The role of KCB Group Company Secretary then ‘resurfaced’ immediately thereafter, in total violation of legal and regulatory requirements.
News & Analysis
Court of Appeal Upholds Eviction of Radcliffes from Karen Land
The Court of Appeal has stayed the decision of the Environment and Land Court purporting to reinstate Adrian Radcliffe into possession of the 5.7 Acre Karen Land by Kena Properties Ltd after eviction by the lawful owners in February 2022. Adrian Radcliffe who was evicted by Kena Properties Ltd, the innocent purchaser of the Land for value.
Before his eviction, Mr. Radcliffe had been living on the land as a squatter expatriate for 33 years without paying any rent. Since he moved into the property as a tenant, he only paid deposit for the land in August 1989 despite corresponding severally with the owner of the land. His attempt to acquire the land by adverse possession claim filed in 2005 was dismissed by Court in 2011 on the basis that he has engaged with the owner of the land July 1997 and agreed to buy the land which he failed to do. The High Court [Justice Kalpana Rawal as she then was] concluded that:
“His [Mr. Adrian Radcliffe] averments that he did not have any idea of the whereabouts of the Defendant and that he could possibly be not alive, were not only very sad but mala fide in view of the correspondence on record addressed by him to the Defendant’s wife. I would thus find that the averments made by him to the contrary are untrue looking to the facts of this case.”
On 10th March 2022, Mr. Adrian Radcliffe and Family purported to obtain court orders for reinstatement into the land. However, the Court of Appeal issued an interim stay of execution of the said orders. The Court of Appeal has now granted the application of Kena Properties Ltd and stayed the execution of the Environment and Land Court Order pending the hearing and determination of the Appeal.
The Court also stayed the proceedings at the Environment and Land Court on the matter during the pendency of the Appeal. In effect, the eviction orders issued by the Chief Magistrate Court for eviction of Mr. Adrian Radcliffe in favour of Kena Properties as the purchaser of the property for value were upheld and the company now enjoys unfettered ownership and possession of the suit property until the conclusion of the Appeal.
The Court of Appeal in granting the orders sought by Kena Properties Ltd concurred with Kena Properties Ltd that as the property owner it had an arguable appeal with a high probability of success which would be rendered nugatory if Adrian Radcliffe a trespasser was to resume his unlawful possession of the suit property, erect structures thereon, recklessly use or abuse the said suit property as he deems fit. In any case, that is bound to fundamentally alter the state of the suit property and render it unusable by Kena Properties Ltd as the property owner.
At the same time, the Appellate Court rubbished the argument of Adrian Radcliffe in opposition to the application for stay that he has been in occupation of the suit property for more than 30 years and that he and his family were unlawfully evicted from the suit property on 4th February, 2022. The Court also rejected Radcliffe’s claim that Kena Properties Ltd has no valid title to the suit property and held that as the purchaser, the company was entitled to enjoy ownership and possession of their property during the pendency of the appeal.
The Court dismissed claims of Mr. Adrian Radcliffe that Kena Properties Ltd as the property owner acquired title to the suit property illegally and unprocedurally finding to the contrary. Further, it rejected Adrian Radcliffe’s claim that Kena Properties as the purchaser cannot evict a legal occupier of a property putting paid to the claim that he was a legal occupier at the time of eviction.
As a matter of fact, Mr. Adrian Radcliffe cannot claim to be the legal occupier of the property having attempted to acquire it by adverse possession before the High Court thwarted his fraudulent scheme on 28th February 2011. Mr. Radcliffe did not appeal the 2011 High Court decision meaning it is still the law that he is not the owner of the land nor the legal occupier of the land having attempted to adversely acquire against the interests of the lawful owner who sold it to Kena Properties.
Mr. Adrian Radcliffe is a well-to-do Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WaSH) UNICEF consultant and former UN employee (who has been earning hefty House Allowance). Many have wondered why he has been defaulting in paying rent for 33 years on the prime plot of land in Karen while living large and taking his kids to most expensive schools in Kenya. No question, a local Kenyan could never have gotten away with such selfish impunity.
News & Analysis
Review: Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 9, No. 1
The Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Volume 9, Issue No. 1, which is edited by and published by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD is out and stays true to the reputation of the journal in providing a platform for scholarly debate on thematic areas in the fields of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development. The current issue published in September 2022 covers diverse topics including Resolving Oil and Gas Disputes in Africa; National Environment Tribunal, Sustainable Development and Access to Justice in Kenya; Protection of Cultural Heritage During War; The Role of Water in the attainment of Sustainable Development in Kenya; Property Rights in Human Biological Materials in Kenya; Nurturing our Wetlands for Biodiversity Conservation; Investor-State Dispute Resolution in a Fast-Paced World; Status of Participation of Women in Mediation; Business of Climate Change and Critical Analysis of World Trade Organization’s Most-Favored Nation (MFN) Treatment.
Dr. Wilfred A. Mutubwa and Eunice Njeri Ng’ang’a in “Resolving Oil and Gas Disputes in an Integrating Africa: An Appraisal of the Role of Regional Arbitration Centres” explore the nature of disputes in the realm of oil and gas in Africa taking a look into the recent continental and sub-regional developments in a bid to establish regional integration. Additionally, it tests the limits of intra-African trade and dispute resolution and the imperatives for the African regional courts and arbitration centres. In “National Environment Tribunal, Sustainable Development and Access to Justice in Kenya,” Dr. Kariuki Muigua discusses the role played by the National Environment Tribunal (NET) in promoting access to justice and enhancing the principles of sustainable development in Kenya. The paper also highlights challenges facing the tribunal and proposes recommendations towards enhancing the effectiveness of the tribunal.
Dr. Kenneth Wyne Mutuma in “Protecting Cultural Heritage in Times of War: A Case for History,” argues that cultural heritage is at the heart of human existence and its preservation even in times of war is sacrosanct. It concludes that it is thus critical for states to take positive and tangible steps to ensure environmental conservation and protection during war within the ambit of the existing international legal framework. In “The Role of Water in the attainment of Sustainable Development in Kenya,” Jack Shivugu critically evaluates the role of water in the attainment of sustainable development in Kenya and argues water plays a critical role in the attainment of the sustainable development goals both in Kenya and at the global stage. The paper interrogates some of the water and Sustainable Development concerns in Kenya including water pollution, water scarcity and climate change and suggests practical ways to enhance the role of water in the Sustainable Development agenda.
Dr. Paul Ogendi in “Collective Property Rights in Human Biological Materials in Kenya,” reflects on property rights in relation to human biological materials obtained from research participants participating in genomic research. He argues that property rights are crucial in genomic research because they can help avoid exploitation or abuse of such precious material by researchers. In “Nurturing our Wetlands for Biodiversity Conservation,” Dr. Kariuki Muigua notes that Wetlands have a vital role in not just delivering ecological services to meet human needs, but also in biodiversity conservation. Wetlands are vital habitat sites for many species and a source of water, both of which contribute to biodiversity protection. The paper examines the role of wetlands in biodiversity conservation and how these wetland resources might be managed to improve biodiversity conservation.
Oseko Louis D. Obure in “Investor-State Dispute Resolution in a Fast-Paced World,” preponderance of disputes between States or States and Investors created need for a robust, effective, and efficient mechanisms not only for the resolution of these disputes but also their prevention. He notes that developing states lead in being parties to Investor-State Disputes (ISD) particularly as respondents. He proceeds to conceptualize and problematize investor-state disputes resolution in a fast-paced world. Lilian N.S. Kong’ani and Dr. Kariuki Muigua in “Status of Participation of Women in Mediation: A case Study of Development Project Conflict in Olkaria IV, Kenya” review the status of participation of women in mediation to resolve conflicts between KenGen and the community. The paper demonstrates a need for further democratization of the mediation processes to cater for more participation of women to enhance the mediation results and offer more sustainable resolutions.
Felix Otieno Odhiambo and Melinda Lorenda Mueni in “The Business of Climate Change: An Analysis of Carbon Trading in Kenya analyses the business of carbon trading in the context of Kenya’s legal framework. The article examines the legal framework that underpins climate change into the Kenyan legal system and provides an exposition of the concept of carbon trading and its various forms. Michael Okello, in “Critical Analysis of World Trade Organisation’s Most-Favored Nation (MFN) Treatment: Prospects, Challenges and Emerging Trends in the 21st Century,” highlights the rationale behind MFN treatment and also restates the vision of multilateral trade to achieve equitable and special interventions with respect to trade in goods, services and trade related intellectual property rights in the affected states.
Chambers Global 2023 Ranks Dr. Kariuki Muigua Among Band 1 Arbitrators Again
Former KCB Company Secretary Sues Over Unlawful Dismissal
CR Advocates LLP is the Kenyan Law Firm to Watch in 2023 after Epic 2022
John Ohaga SC Scoops Kenya and Africa Top Arbitrator Accolades
Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD: The Top Arbitrator in Africa
Court of Appeal Upholds Eviction of Radcliffes from Karen Land
News & Analysis11 months ago
The Role of NEMA in Pollution Control in Kenya
News & Analysis9 months ago
THE TOP 200 ARBITRATORS IN KENYA 2022
Law Firms11 months ago
TEMPLARS Advised Lagos Free Zone Company (LFZC) on Development of Integrated Gas Network
Law Firms1 year ago
Nyaanga & Mugisha Advocates: A Full-Service Boutique Law Firm on the Rise
News & Analysis1 year ago
The Definition and Scope of Biodiversity
News & Analysis1 year ago
The Definition, Aspects and Theories of Development
News & Analysis9 months ago
The List of the Top 30 Practicing Arbitrators in Kenya
Law Firms1 year ago
IFLR1000 Recognizes Ngeri, Omiti & Bush Advocates, LLP as Top Tier Firm in Kenya