News & Analysis
When is Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Considered Necessary?
Published
5 years agoon
By Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD (Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Policy Advisor, Natural Resources Lawyer and Dispute Resolution Expert from Kenya), Winner of Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021, ADR Publication of the Year 2021 and CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021*
In several cases, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) license has been challenged on the basis that the it was issued before Strategic Environment Assessment as issued. One such case is the recently concluded National Environmental Tribunal (NET) Appeal in Greenbelt Movement & 5 others v National Environmental Management Authority & another; Kenya National Highways Authority (Interested Party), National Environmental Tribunal (NET) Appeal No. 19 of 2020 challenging NEMA approval of the Nairobi Expressway EIA. One of the issues the NET comprising Mohammed Balala (Chairperson), Christine Kipsang (Vice Chairperson), Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD (Member), Bahati Mwamuye (Member) and Waithaka Ngaruiya (Member) had to grapple with in making their landmark decision was whether the EIA was irregularly issued for lack of a strategic environmental assessment. The case has brought to the fore the question of when a Strategic Environmental Assessment is necessary whether on its own or as a prerequisite for Environmental Impact Assessment. In determining whether SEA is necessary, one has to look at the provisions of the Environmental Management and Coordination Act, No. 8 of 1999 and Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003 on SEA as well as the National Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) 2012 and case law.
The Environmental Management and Coordination Act in section 57A provides that “All Policies, Plans and Programmes for implementation shall be subject to Strategic Environmental Assessment.” The Act clarifies that for the avoidance of doubt, the plans, programmes and policies are those that are subject to preparation or adoption by an authority at regional, national, county or local level, or which are prepared by an authority for adoption through a legislative procedure by Parliament, Government or if regional, by agreements between the governments or regional authorities, as the case may be and determined by NEMA as likely to have significant effects on the environment. Further, all entities are required to undertake or cause to be undertaken the preparation of strategic environmental assessments at their own expense and submit such assessments to NEMA for approval in accordance with rules and guidelines prescribes by NEMA for in respect of Strategic Environmental Assessments.
Besides EMCA, Rule 42 of Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003 provides that: “(1) Lead agencies shall in consultation with the Authority subject all proposals for public policy, plans and programmes for environmental implementation to a strategic environmental assessment to determine which ones are the most environmentally friendly and cost effective when implemented individually or in combination with others. (2) The assessment carried out under this regulation shall consider the effect of implementation of alternative policy actions taking into consideration – (a) the use of natural resources; (b) the protection and conservation of biodiversity; (c) human settlement and cultural issues; (d) socio-economic factors; and (e) the protection, conservation of natural physical surroundings of scenic beauty as well as protection and conservation of built environment of historic or cultural significance. (3) The Government, and all the lead agencies shall in the development of sector or national policy, incorporate principles of strategic environmental assessment.”
The National Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) 2012 defines Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) as referring to “a range of analytical and participatory approaches that aims to integrate environmental consideration into policies, plans and programmes and evaluate the interlinkages with economic and social considerations. SEA is a family of approaches, which use a variety of tools, rather than a single, fixed and prescriptive approach. This process extends the aims and principles of EIA upstream in the decision-making process, beyond the project level and when major alternatives are still opens (UNEP, 2002). SEA represents a proactive approach to integrating environmental considerations into the higher levels of decision making, consistent with the principles outlined in Agenda 21.”
The principles of SEA include: (a) the sustainable use of natural resources, (b) the enhanced protection and conservation of biodiversity, (c) interlinkage of human settlement and cultural issues, (d) integration of socio-economic and environmental factors, (e) the protection and conservation of natural physical surroundings of scenic beauty as well as protection and conservation of built environment of historic or cultural significance, and (f) Public and stakeholder engagement. In turn, the benefits of SEA include safeguarding the environmental assets and opportunities upon which all people depend, particularly the poor, and so promote sustainable poverty reduction and development. SEA also helps in improving decision making related to policies, plans and programmes, in improving development outcomes and in strengthening and streamlining project specific EIA.
In order for the SEA process to be influential and to help improve policy-making, planning and decision-taking, it should: (a) Establish clear goals, objectives and targets of the PPP (b) Be integrated with existing policy and planning structures (c) Be flexible, iterative and customized to context (d) Analyze the potential effects and risks of the proposed PPP, and its alternatives, against a framework of sustainability objectives, principles and criteria (e) Provide explicit justification for the selection of preferred options and for the acceptance of significant trade-off (f) Identify environmental and other opportunities and constraints (g) Address the linkages and trade-offs between environmental, social and economic considerations. (h) Involve key stakeholders and encourage public involvement (i) Include an effective, preferably independent, quality assurance system (j) Be transparent throughout the process, and communicate the results (k) Be cost effective – avoid duplication of efforts and encourage synergies (l) Encourage formal reviews of the process after completion, and monitor PPP outputs and (m)Provide opportunities to build capacity for both its undertaking and use.
Screening is undertaken to determine the potential of a PPP to result in significant effects on the environment, hat is, to decide whether or not an SEA is required. Methods and techniques used to screen strategic proposals vary depending on the nature and the objectives of the PPPs, as well as the decision-makers needs. Screening could be influenced by amongst others, the sphere of decision –making involved (e.g. local, national or regional), whether a PPP is being developed or assessed, and the potential impacts associated with development in different sectors (for example water sector, housing sector, energy sector, etc) to which the PPP relate. Given that application of SEA can become a lengthy and expensive procedure if it is not appropriately focused, the SEA process needs to be carefully focused so that it looks only at the key strategic issues and take into account capacity constraints.
There are various methods available for screening, such as the use of formal “triggers” and checklists (that is, using a set of criteria or list of questions as prompts), seeking advice from a competent authority or other expertise, amongst others. These methods are used to indicate whether PPP is likely to have a significant environmental effect (both positive and negative) and a SEA should be carried out where significant effects on the environment are likely. In considering whether or not a SEA should be undertaken, it is necessary to take into account the nature of the strategic proposal and the nature of the environment that would be affected.
It is considered appropriate to carry out a SEA where, amongst others: the PPP is likely to result in significant environmental effects, taking into account the magnitude, duration and spatial extent of effects, the proposed PPP is likely to be politically or publicly contentious; the cumulative nature of the effects (i.e. the additive and synergistic effects) are likely to be significant; there are likely to be trans-boundary effects, that is, it is likely to affect other municipalities, counties, regions and countries). Further, SEA is needed where the level of confidence in predicting effects of the proposed PPP are low, there are inherent uncertainties and/or important gaps in information in predicting effects, and/or the PPP is unprecedented; risks to health, safety and/or the integrity of social or ecological systems are considered to be high; social and/or ecological systems have low resilience and high vulnerability to disturbance or impact (for example poor communities, sensitive ecosystems); and the existing levels of environmental quality are close to defined limits of acceptable change.
SEA is also considered appropriate where the PPP is likely to have a negative impact on unique, special or highly valued natural or cultural elements like threatened biodiversity, sacred areas and recognized local, county, national or international conservation or protection status, for example, nature reserve, heritage sites and Ramsar sites. SEA is also recommended where a PPP is likely to result in major changes in actions, behaviours or decisions by individuals, businesses, NGOs or government, that could lead to: the stimulation of development of infrastructure or other changes in urban or rural land use; an increase in the transformation and development of natural habitat or areas of nature conservation importance: major changes in the pattern of settlement, land occupation and/or demographics in an area: major changes in the development or use of technology, that could have negative implications for health and/or safety: the introduction of alien and potentially invasive organisms; changes in society’s consumption of energy and in particular fossil fuels, and therefore, in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases; and changes in the rate of society’s consumption of, and/or demand on natural resources, including water.
*This article is part of the series on Principles of Natural Resources Management in Kenya extracted from Legal Aspects of Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Management by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya). Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a Senior Lecturer of Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law and The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP). He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Dr. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Africa Trustee of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates. Dr. Muigua is recognized as one of the leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts by the Chambers Global Guide 2022.
References
Environmental Management and Coordination Act, No. 8 of 1999;
Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003
Greenbelt Movement & 5 others v National Environmental Management Authority & another; Kenya National Highways Authority (Interested Party), National Environmental Tribunal (NET) Appeal No. 19 of 2020.
Muigua, K., Legal Aspects of Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Management; Available at: http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Legal-Aspects-of-SEA-and-Environmental-Management-3RD-December-2016.pdf (accessed on 23/02/2022).
National Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) 2012 and case law.
You may like
-
Prof. Kariuki Muigua’s Quarter Century Journey to the Top Arbitrator in Africa
-
Prof. Kariuki Muigua Trailblazing Journey to the Pinnacle of International Arbitration
-
Enhancing Role of Mediation and Conciliation in Resolving Conflicts for Global Peace
-
The Challenges in Actualizing Sustainable Blue Economy in Kenya
-
The Meaning of Blue Economy in Kenyan Context
-
The Meaning of Environmental Pollution in Kenya
News & Analysis
Book Review: Climate Finance, Carbon Markets and Environmental Justice in Africa
Published
6 months agoon
March 21, 2026
By Prof. Kariuki Muigua SC, OGW, PhD, FCS, FCIArb, Ch.Arb, Managing Partner Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates, Member Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and Member Asian International Arbitration Centre Court of Arbitration
Introduction
Climate Finance, Carbon Markets and Environmental Justice in Africa (March 2026) by Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua is a timely and comprehensive work examining the intersection of climate finance, carbon markets, and environmental justice on the African continent. The book’s central thesis—that climate responses must be designed and implemented in a manner that safeguards rights, promotes fairness, and ensures benefits are equitably distributed—provides a sophisticated framework for understanding how financial flows, market-based mechanisms, and regulatory frameworks intersect with law, policy, and community realities across Africa. Situated within the broader discourse on climate justice, this volume interrogates both opportunities and emerging risks associated with climate action in a continent that contributes minimally to global emissions yet bears disproportionate climate impacts.
Overview
The volume comprises twelve chapters organized into four thematic parts. Part I establishes foundations for fair and equitable climate finance. Chapter One examines climate finance through an environmental justice lens, arguing that access to timely, adequate, and equitable climate finance is vital for the Global South. The chapter analyses how prevailing financing structures may reinforce dependency and inequality, with climate finance often delivered through loans on unfavourable terms that contribute to Africa’s growing debt crisis. Prof. Muigua argues that avoiding debt traps, narrative injustice, and recolonization of the Global South requires developed countries to fulfil their climate finance commitments and enhance the voice of developing countries in global decision-making processes.
Chapter Two rethinks climate finance in Africa within the continent’s debt and development realities. The chapter observes that despite Africa’s extreme vulnerability to climate change, the continent receives only around two percent of total global climate finance. Furthermore, climate finance is linked to the debt crisis, with debt constituting nearly forty percent of climate finance flows to African countries already experiencing debt distress. Prof. Muigua calls for overhauling the international climate finance system to make it fairer, including through enhanced access to grants and concessional finance, elimination of bureaucratic hurdles, and implementation of the Loss and Damage Fund.
Chapter Three examines climate finance and equitable benefit sharing with particular focus on indigenous and local communities. These communities are disproportionately impacted by climate change due to their dependence upon and close relationship with the environment, yet they are often sidelined in climate finance decision-making processes. Prof. Muigua argues that fully and effectively engaging indigenous peoples and local communities in the design, development, and implementation of climate finance activities is essential for upholding their rights, respecting their cultural needs, and addressing their unique vulnerabilities.
Chapter Four explores unlocking climate finance for sustainable development in Africa, examining structural and institutional pathways for mobilising finance. The chapter highlights the need for innovative financial tools including green bonds and debt-for-nature swaps, strengthening governance frameworks, and implementing global commitments including the Loss and Damage Fund and Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Part II addresses carbon markets, projects, and justice. Chapter Five examines carbon projects through the lens of justice and equity, focusing on access to information, Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and equitable benefit sharing. The chapter argues that while carbon projects can strengthen climate action and provide co-benefits including job creation and ecosystem restoration, poorly designed projects can cause human rights violations and environmental damage. Ensuring good governance in carbon projects is imperative for fostering climate justice.
Chapter Six analyses participation and governance in carbon projects, exploring how environmental democracy—comprising access to information, public participation, and access to justice—can be integrated into carbon project governance. The chapter observes that carbon projects can undermine environmental democracy when investors fail to obtain FPIC, when transparency and accountability concerns arise, and when disputes over land rights emerge. Fostering environmental democracy requires enhanced access to information, meaningful public participation, access to justice through both litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution, and equitable benefit sharing.
Chapter Seven develops a conceptual framework for carbon justice in Africa, examining principles of fairness, rights, and sustainability in carbon governance. The chapter identifies carbon injustices including transparency challenges, inequitable benefit sharing, and violation of indigenous land rights. Applying carbon justice tenets requires meaningful involvement of stakeholders, strengthening land tenure rights, ensuring transparency, fostering equitable benefit sharing, and ensuring access to justice.
Part III focuses on carbon disputes and enforcement. Chapter Eight introduces disputes arising in carbon markets, examining risks including greenwashing, information asymmetry, misleading conduct, insider trading, and price manipulation. The chapter analyses available dispute management mechanisms including arbitration, litigation, and conciliation, arguing that arbitration offers particular advantages including party autonomy, flexibility, expertise, transnational applicability, and enforceability of awards.
Chapter Nine examines dealing with carbon disputes for green growth and sustainability. The chapter argues that carbon disputes—whether arising from carbon accounting challenges, pricing fluctuations, or land disputes between investors and indigenous communities—can undermine the effective functioning of carbon markets. Managing carbon disputes through both litigation and ADR processes is essential for ensuring carbon markets contribute to green growth and sustainable development.
Chapter Ten focuses on arbitrating carbon disputes, examining arbitration’s role in managing disputes arising from carbon markets. The chapter argues that arbitration is a viable mechanism due to its ability to accommodate specialized expertise, ensure neutrality in cross-border disputes, maintain confidentiality for commercially sensitive information, and provide enforceability through the New York Convention. Addressing challenges including transparency concerns and costs requires building capacity and awareness among arbitration practitioners and adopting specialized rules tailored to carbon markets.
Part IV addresses decarbonization and future directions. Chapter Eleven examines policy pathways for achieving green growth and carbon neutrality in Africa, analysing sustainability strategies and their implications for development. The chapter argues that green growth—growth that is environmentally sustainable, low-carbon, and socially inclusive—and carbon neutrality—balancing carbon emissions with carbon removal—provide efficient pathways toward sustainable development. Achieving these goals requires considerable investment in renewable energy, low-emission transport, energy-efficient building, sustainable agriculture, and forest management.
Chapter Twelve examines decarbonizing energy for climate action and justice, evaluating how decarbonization pathways can support inclusive and sustainable development. The chapter argues that while energy is a vital resource enabling human progress, the energy sector is the dominant contributor to climate change, accounting for nearly two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions. Decarbonizing energy through shifting from fossil fuels to renewable sources including wind, solar, and geothermal, coupled with improving energy efficiency across all sectors, is fundamental for climate action and social justice.
Key Themes
Climate Justice and Environmental Justice. The book advances climate justice as a key ideal for upholding equity, fairness, inclusivity, and human rights in climate action. Prof. Muigua argues that climate change is a major cause of injustices and inequalities, with people and communities who have contributed the least being affected the most. Climate justice acknowledges that climate change effects are not evenly felt and focuses on protecting the most vulnerable including the poor, women and girls, youth, indigenous peoples, and local communities. Environmental justice encompasses the right to access natural resources, not to suffer disproportionately from environmental policies, and to have environmental information and participation in decision-making processes.
Fair and Equitable Climate Finance. The book critically examines the climate finance landscape, arguing that access to adequate and timely climate finance is a matter of justice for the Global South. Prof. Muigua demonstrates how current financing structures may reinforce dependency and inequality, with climate finance often delivered on unfavourable terms that contribute to debt crises. The principle of common but differentiated responsibility requires developed countries to provide financial resources to assist developing countries responding to climate change. Reforming the international financial system to make climate finance more affordable and adequate for developing countries is essential for environmental justice.
Carbon Markets and Environmental Democracy. The book explores how carbon markets can strengthen climate action while also raising critical concerns relating to environmental democracy. Prof. Muigua argues that carbon projects can undermine democracy when investors fail to obtain FPIC, when transparency and accountability concerns arise, and when disputes over land rights emerge. Fostering environmental democracy in carbon projects requires enhanced access to information, meaningful public participation, access to justice, and equitable benefit sharing. The three mutually reinforcing rights of environmental democracy—access to information, participation in decision-making, and access to justice—provide a framework for ensuring carbon projects serve people and planet.
Free, Prior and Informed Consent and Equitable Benefit Sharing. The book places FPIC and equitable benefit sharing at the centre of just carbon governance. FPIC is a fundamental right of self-determination ensuring participation by all people with particular focus on indigenous peoples and local communities in development projects. It allows communities to give or withhold consent to projects affecting their territories and to withdraw consent at any stage. Equitable benefit sharing ensures both monetary and non-monetary benefits from carbon projects are enjoyed by all stakeholders including indigenous peoples, landowners, and local communities who contribute significantly to project success.
Dispute Management in Carbon Markets. The book provides comprehensive analysis of disputes arising in carbon markets and mechanisms for their management. Prof. Muigua identifies causes including lack of clarity in carbon accounting, greenwashing claims, pricing fluctuations, and land disputes between investors and indigenous communities. Arbitration emerges as a preferred mechanism due to party autonomy, flexibility, expertise, neutrality, transnational applicability, and enforceability of awards. However, the book also recognises the importance of negotiation, mediation, and conciliation for preserving relationships and ensuring the long-term viability of carbon projects.
Conclusion
Climate Finance, Carbon Markets and Environmental Justice in Africa is a seminal work elevating discourse on climate action from African perspectives. Prof. Muigua demonstrates that confronting climate change requires not only technical solutions but also fundamental attention to justice, equity, and human rights. The book argues that climate finance must be restructured to avoid debt traps and recolonization, carbon markets must be governed through environmental democracy principles including FPIC and equitable benefit sharing, and disputes must be managed through effective mechanisms that preserve relationships and ensure accountability. This volume is essential reading for legal practitioners, policymakers, scholars, development practitioners, and all committed to advancing climate justice and sustainable development in Africa.
News & Analysis
Book Review: Securing Our Destiny through Effective Management of the Environment
Published
6 months agoon
March 19, 2026
By Prof. Kariuki Muigua SC, OGW, PhD, FCS, FCIArb, Ch.Arb, Managing Partner Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates, Member Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and Member Asian International Arbitration Centre Court of Arbitration
Introduction
Securing Our Destiny through Effective Management of the Environment (Second Edition, 2026) by Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua is a comprehensive work examining the role of law, governance, and institutions in promoting sustainable environmental management in Kenya and Africa. The book’s central thesis—that effective environmental governance requires integrated approaches combining legal frameworks, participatory processes, indigenous knowledge systems, and accountability mechanisms—provides a sophisticated framework for addressing contemporary environmental challenges while advancing sustainable development.
Overview
The volume comprises fourteen chapters organized into four thematic parts. Part I establishes foundations of environmental governance and law, examining the role of law in environmental management, constitutional provisions on natural resources, corporate environmental responsibility, and environmental democracy. Prof. Muigua argues that law must strike a balance between anthropocentric and ecocentric approaches, serving not merely as a regulatory tool but as a means of achieving social justice. The analysis demonstrates how courts play a crucial role in safeguarding environmental rights through judicial activism, public interest litigation, and promoting sustainable development principles. The discussion of environmental democracy highlights three mutually reinforcing rights: access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in environmental matters.
Chapter Two explores effective environmental governance in Africa, arguing for incorporating dialogue, Ubuntu philosophy, and democracy into governance frameworks. Prof. Muigua observes that Africa’s environmental governance challenges—weak institutions, poor enforcement, inadequate investment, and exclusion of vulnerable groups—undermine sustainability. Ubuntu, as an African philosophy emphasising interconnectedness and communal responsibility, provides an Afrocentric approach requiring humans to use natural resources responsibly and non-exploitatively for the greater good of humanity. Dialogue fosters inclusive, participatory approaches essential for sound environmental governance.
Chapter Three examines implementing constitutional provisions on natural resources and environmental management in Kenya. The Constitution establishes state obligations including sustainable exploitation, utilisation, management and conservation of the environment, achieving ten percent forest cover, equitable benefit sharing, and establishing environmental impact assessment systems. Prof. Muigua identifies disconnects between constitutional promises and implementation, particularly regarding community participation, which remains largely top-down despite constitutional guarantees. Achieving sustainable and inclusive approaches requires empowering communities through information access, decentralised governance, and meaningful participation in decision-making.
Chapter Four analyses corporate environmental responsibility, examining legal frameworks holding corporations accountable for environmental harm. The Constitution and EMCA impose both civil and criminal liability on corporations and their officers for environmental breaches. Environmental management tools including Environmental Impact Assessment, Strategic Environmental Assessment, environmental audits, and public participation provide mechanisms for ensuring corporate compliance. The chapter examines the Natural Resources (Classes of Transaction Subject to Ratification by Parliament) Act 2016, which requires parliamentary ratification of natural resource exploitation agreements, promoting transparency and accountability.
Chapter Five addresses realising environmental democracy in Kenya, exploring how access to information, public participation, and access to justice can empower communities. Prof. Muigua examines practical mechanisms including demonstrations, picketing, petitions, media engagement, civil society activism, and proactive judicial roles in environmental justice.
Part II examines natural resource governance and sectoral environmental management. Chapter Six provides a comprehensive analysis of Kenya’s extractives industry regulatory framework, examining the Mining Act 2016, Petroleum Act 2019, and associated regulations. The chapter discusses the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and its potential to promote open and accountable management of oil, gas, and mineral resources, helping Kenya avoid the “resource curse” that has afflicted other resource-rich African nations.
Chapter Seven explores the blue economy, examining challenges and opportunities for harnessing Kenya’s marine and freshwater resources for sustainable development. Challenges include illegal fishing, piracy, maritime terrorism, illicit trade, environmental degradation, border disputes, and lack of capacity. Recommendations include entering mutually beneficial partnerships, curbing pollution, supporting communities to venture into seafood business, and adopting integrated approaches to coastal zone management.
Chapter Eight examines benefit sharing from natural resources exploitation, discussing legal frameworks including the Natural Resources (Benefit Sharing) Bill 2018, Mining Act 2016, and Petroleum Act 2019. Prof. Muigua draws lessons from Ghana’s mineral royalty distribution system and Nigeria’s resource curse experience, recommending foundations and trusts, enhanced local accountability, capacity building, access to environmental information, devolution, public participation, and addressing corruption.
Chapter Nine examines carbon projects and climate justice, arguing that while carbon projects can promote climate justice by strengthening climate action and protecting ecosystems, poorly implemented projects can cause human rights violations and environmental damage. Ensuring access to information, Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), and equitable benefit-sharing is essential for designing and implementing carbon projects sustainably.
Part III addresses integrated environmental management and accountability frameworks. Chapter Ten examines integrated approaches to environmental management, arguing for entrenching ecocentric approaches alongside anthropocentric perspectives. The chapter highlights the neglected link of safeguarding pollinators for sustainable development, discussing threats including habitat loss, pesticide use, and climate change, and recommending integrated pest management, environmental education, scientific research, and traditional knowledge integration.
Chapter Eleven examines strengthening environmental liability regimes in Kenya, discussing civil and criminal liability, environmental impact assessment, strategic environmental assessment, environmental audits, and sustainable development principles. Recommendations include encouraging proactive corporate compliance, cultivating environmental ethics through due diligence, and promoting environmental insurance.
Part IV explores indigenous knowledge, environmental justice, and peace building. Chapter Twelve examines mainstreaming traditional ecological knowledge in Kenya, arguing that indigenous knowledge systems offer valuable insights into sustainable resource stewardship. International and national legal frameworks recognise traditional knowledge, but implementation remains weak. Mainstreaming requires integrating indigenous knowledge with scientific approaches, ensuring meaningful community participation, and strengthening local democracy.
Chapter Thirteen examines the nexus between environmental governance and peace building, arguing that effective environmental management contributes to lasting peace by addressing resource scarcity, preventing conflicts over natural resources, and promoting equitable benefit sharing. SDG 16 recognises that sustainable development cannot be achieved without peace, and peace cannot be sustained without sustainable development. Recommendations include using alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, adopting inclusive and participatory approaches, and promoting education for sustainable livelihoods.
Key Themes
Integrated Environmental Governance. The book emphasises that effective environmental management requires integrated approaches combining legal frameworks, participatory processes, indigenous knowledge, and accountability mechanisms.
Environmental Democracy and Procedural Rights. Access to information, public participation, and access to justice are essential for empowering communities and ensuring environmental justice.
Corporate Environmental Responsibility. Corporations bear both civil and criminal liability for environmental harm, requiring proactive compliance, due diligence, and adherence to sustainable development principles.
Indigenous Knowledge Systems. Traditional ecological knowledge and African philosophies like Ubuntu provide valuable insights for sustainable environmental governance.
Environmental Justice and Peace Building. Effective environmental management contributes to peace by addressing resource conflicts, ensuring equitable benefit sharing, and protecting vulnerable communities.
Conclusion
Securing Our Destiny through Effective Management of the Environment is a seminal work that elevates discourse on environmental governance from Kenyan and African perspectives while engaging seriously with international frameworks. Prof. Muigua demonstrates that securing our environmental destiny requires integrated approaches balancing environmental, social and economic interests through effective legal frameworks, participatory processes, indigenous knowledge systems, and accountability mechanisms. This volume is essential reading for legal practitioners, policymakers, scholars, and all committed to advancing environmental governance and sustainable development in Kenya and beyond.
News & Analysis
Book Review: Resolving Conflicts Through Mediation in Kenya: Law and Practice (Third Edition)
Published
6 months agoon
March 13, 2026
By Prof. Kariuki Muigua SC, OGW, PhD, FCS, FCIArb, Ch.Arb, Managing Partner Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates, Member Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and Member Asian International Arbitration Centre Court of Arbitration
Introduction
The third edition of Prof. Kariuki Muigua’s comprehensive work arrives at a pivotal moment in Kenya’s justice sector evolution. Since the second edition in 2017, court-annexed mediation has expanded beyond Nairobi to stations nationwide, constitutional recognition under Article 159 has gained deeper traction, and questions about balancing institutionalisation with accessibility have gained urgency. Prof. Muigua, recipient of multiple awards including ADR Practitioner of the Year (2021) and Lifetime Achievement from CIArb-Kenya, brings decades of practice as mediator, arbitrator and scholar to this updated edition, which incorporates new discussions on access to justice, family mediation, professional ethics, and alternative justice systems.
Structure and Scope
The sixteen chapters are organised into four thematic parts. Part I (Chapters 1-4) establishes conceptual foundations. Chapter One introduces mediation’s attributes—voluntariness, party autonomy, confidentiality, flexibility, informality, cost-effectiveness—distinguishing mediation in the political process (leading to resolution) from mediation in the legal process (leading only to settlement). The survey of other ADR mechanisms provides essential context. Chapter Two examines traditional conflict resolution mechanisms among African societies, documenting principles of common humanity (Ubuntu/Utu), reciprocity and respect, and institutions including the family, clan, council of elders, age-set systems, and mechanisms such as kinship ties, joking relations, consensus approaches, and the role of elders. The chapter argues that realising access to justice requires enhanced application of traditional forms, which remain part of Kenyan society and hence their constitutionalisation.
Chapter Three examines mediation’s attributes in depth, providing a comparative table demonstrating that political process mediation has fifteen positive attributes while legal process mediation has only five, explaining why the former leads to enduring outcomes addressing root causes while the latter produces only superficial settlements. Chapter Four distinguishes conflicts (non-negotiable needs and values) from disputes (negotiable interests), arguing conflicts require resolution through non-coercive mechanisms like mediation while disputes can be settled through coercive mechanisms like litigation.
Part II (Chapters 5-9) examines practical dynamics. Chapter Five explores mediation as “assisted negotiation” where a mediator with no decision-making authority facilitates communication. Chapter Six analyses settlement (power-based, temporal, addressing only surface issues) versus resolution (addressing root causes, producing enduring outcomes). Chapter Seven examines the three-phase mediation process: pre-negotiation, negotiation (active listening, reframing, caucusing), and post-negotiation implementation. Chapter Eight examines the mediation paradigm—parties, constituents, third parties, and societal factors. Chapter Nine examines psychological issues, arguing all disputes involve injury to feelings and mediators must address emotional needs through empathy and creative problem-solving.
Part III (Chapters 10-11) examines legal frameworks. Chapter Ten traces mediation’s evolution from the 2009 amendments through the Constitution to court-annexed mediation, providing detailed analysis of the pilot project’s statistics (421 referrals, 61 settlements, 28.5% settlement rate, 66 days average duration) and external evaluation recommendations. The chapter critiques court-annexed mediation as potentially sacrificing core attributes—voluntariness, informality, party autonomy—at the altar of legalism. Chapter Eleven examines mediation and access to justice, analysing environmental conflicts (involving actors, resources and stakes) and family mediation, noting that while the Marriage Act 2014 contemplates reconciliation, there are no clear guidelines for divorce, custody, or property division mediation.
Part IV (Chapters 12-16) examines contemporary developments. Chapter Twelve examines entrenching family mediation, arguing it empowers parties to negotiate mutually agreed decisions, reduces post-divorce conflict, and promotes children’s best interests. It examines standards of practice, power imbalances, and cross-disciplinary training. Chapter Thirteen examines mediation and alternative justice systems, analysing their efficacy (rooted in culture, accessible, affordable, focused on reconciliation) and challenges (patriarchal values, procedural fairness concerns). It examines the Alternative Justice Systems Framework Policy’s interventions for mainstreaming AJS while addressing human rights concerns.
Chapter Fourteen provides comprehensive analysis of ethics: impartiality, independence, competence, confidentiality, disclosure of conflicts, quality of process, costs and fees, and termination. It examines professional standards from UNCITRAL, Singapore Convention, ICC, CIArb, NCIA, and Kigali International Arbitration Centre, identifying ethical dilemmas and proposing enhanced training and institutional enforcement. Chapter Fifteen reflects on mediation’s future, examining opportunities in access to justice, environmental democracy, and sustainable development. Recommendations include facilitative frameworks bridging traditional and formal mechanisms, embedding mediation in devolved administration, multi-door courtrooms, mediator training, codes of conduct, institutionalising women’s role, and appropriate accreditation committee composition. Chapter Sixteen concludes that mediation’s future success depends on maintaining balance between institutionalisation and accessibility while preserving core attributes.
Critical Assessment
Strengths. The book’s comprehensive scope is its greatest strength. Sixteen chapters trace mediation from foundations through practice to contemporary developments, integrating traditional mechanisms, legal frameworks, psychological dimensions, ethics, and future trajectories. This breadth, combined with depth drawing on Kenyan case law, statutory provisions, institutional rules, comparative experience, and empirical research, makes the volume indispensable.
The integration of traditional conflict resolution mechanisms is particularly valuable. Rather than treating mediation as imported Western innovation, Prof. Muigua grounds analysis in Kenya’s traditions of community-based resolution, documenting institutions and mechanisms that provide essential foundation for understanding mediation’s cultural resonance and constitutional recognition under Article 159.
The analysis of court-annexed mediation is both thorough and critical, documenting pilot project implementation and evaluation while questioning whether institutionalisation preserves mediation’s core attributes. The consistent distinction between political process mediation (leading to resolution) and legal process mediation (leading only to settlement) provides a framework for evaluating institutionalisation efforts.
The treatment of psychological issues adds distinctive depth, examining how mediators must address emotional needs through empathy and creative problem-solving. The ethics chapter provides comprehensive guidance on fundamental responsibilities and professional standards, identifying dilemmas and proposing practical responses.
Limitations. The collection format has produced repetition of foundational concepts across chapters. While thorough, some topics might benefit from deeper empirical engagement with comparative data. The length may challenge readers seeking concise introduction.
Contribution to Scholarship and Practice
The book provides comprehensive documentation of Kenyan mediation law and practice, invaluable for practitioners and scholars. It advances understanding of mediation’s constitutional foundations under Article 159, examining how constitutional imperatives shape mediation’s role. It offers sophisticated analysis of traditional conflict resolution mechanisms, arguing mediation in Africa is not imported innovation but continuation of longstanding cultural traditions. It provides practical guidance for practitioners while maintaining scholarly rigour. It contributes to policy development by analysing court-annexed mediation implementation and proposing reforms. It advances understanding of emerging areas—family mediation, AJS, ethics—reshaping Kenyan practice.
Conclusion
Prof. Muigua’s Resolving Conflicts Through Mediation in Kenya (Third Edition) is a monumental contribution to mediation scholarship and practice. Its central thesis—that mediation’s strength lies in transforming conflict into dialogue, and its future depends on balancing institutionalisation with accessibility while preserving core attributes—is timely and persuasive. For practitioners, scholars, policymakers and students, this book is essential reading, ensuring Prof. Muigua’s authoritative work remains at the forefront of mediation scholarship, responsive to emerging developments while grounded in enduring principles and Kenya’s rich traditions of community-based conflict resolution.
The Lawyer Africa | Top Commercial Lawyers in Kenya 2026
Beyond the Boardroom: The Role of Mediation in Resolving Board Disputes in Family-Owned Enterprises
The Lawyer Africa | Top Real Estate and Finance Lawyers in Kenya 2026
Why Demanding Rent or Filing a Rent Tribunal Case Cannot Defeat Adverse Possession
Dr. Paul Kimani Appointed Young ICSID Africa Regional Delegate and Honored at Nairobi Legal Awards
The Lawyer Africa | Top Litigation Lawyers in Kenya 2026
Trending
-
Lawyers3 years agoTHE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame | Kenya in 2023
-
Lawyers3 years agoTHE LAWYER AFRICA Top 100 Litigation Lawyers in Kenya 2023
-
Uncategorized7 months agoChambers Ranks Sixteen (16) Senior Counsel at Top of Litigation and Arbitration in 2026
-
Lawyers1 year agoThe Lawyer Africa | Top Litigation Lawyers in Kenya 2025
-
News & Analysis4 years agoThe Definition and Scope of Biodiversity
-
News & Analysis5 years agoThe Definition, Aspects and Theories of Development
-
News & Analysis3 years agoThe Role of NEMA in Pollution Control in Kenya
-
News & Analysis4 years agoTHE TOP 200 ARBITRATORS IN KENYA 2022
