By Renson Mulele Ingonga is an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya, LLB (Moi), LLM (UON) and the Nominee Director of Public Prosecution of Kenya.
There are two instances that can trigger the ELC to invoke Section 20 of the ELC Act and refer environmental disputes to ADR. First, the ELC on its own motion can refer parties in an environmental suit to adopt and implement an ADR. Second, parties can request the ELC that the matter be referred to ADR.
a) The ELC referral
Section 20(1) grants the ELC power on its own motion to refer parties to ADR. In referring the parties to use ADR in solving the dispute in question, it is mandatory that the parties must agree to this. The term ‘with the agreement of’ connotes consensus. The drafters of the ELC Act may have anticipated a scenario whereby it would be useless for the ELC to order parties to use ADR, a process which they don’t agree upon. This would lead to wastage of time and in some cases aggravate the dispute. This will also guard against the misuse of the discretional power of the ELC to refer environmental matters to ADR against the will of the parties concerned. One of the characteristics of ADR is that the process is usually voluntary and allows the parties to negotiate. In agreeing with the Court’s order for an out of court settlement, the parties submit to the ADR enhancing its enforcement.
The question that arises is when the ELC can invoke Section 20 (1) of the ELC Act to adopt and implement an ADR mechanism in resolving environmental disputes before it. The ELC can deploy ADR in two instances: early in the process; or any time during the trial but before it makes a final decision. Requesting the parties to adopt ADR early in the process is the most optimal. Whilst the ELC Act requires that the ELC environmental ADR referral be discretional, in some cases such a referral can be mandatory. Mandatory referrals arise where the law governing the dispute requires that such a matter be resolved through ADR. Arbitration agreement is the most common. Where an arbitration agreement between the parties in a suit exists, the parties will be required to exhaust the dispute through arbitration.
b) Parties request for referral
It is trite law that where parties request for referral of an environmental dispute to ADR mechanism, the court should not refuse such a request unless it is in the Court’s view that such a referral will inhibit justice. In requesting the referral of the dispute to ADR, the parties have an obligation to provide the ELC with sufficient reasons why they would want to refer the matter to ADR. This would caution against wastage of the ELC time and resources. However, in cases where not all parties in a suit request for referral to ADR, the ELC may refuse such a request until when all parties agree.
Adopting and Implementing of Environmental ADR in the ELC
The ELC has a number of ADR mechanisms which it can refer the parties to adopt which include arbitration, mediation, conciliation, negotiation etc. Whichever form of ADR the ELC adopts must be determined by the nature of environmental dispute in place and balancing of the interests of the stakeholders involved. Molly and Rubenstein, provide that one of the key questions to be addressed in adopting environmental ADR is to determine where it can be placed within the existing conventional ADR. They provide that environmental ADR can be annexed to a dispute resolution entity such as the court or environmental regulatory mechanism.
There are various ways in which the ELC can adopt and implement environmental ADR. ADR can either be supervised ADR (also referred to as court annexed ADR) or judicial referral of a dispute to an appropriate ADR process. The Land and Environment of New South Wales in settling environmental disputes adopts both in-house mechanism and external. In-house mechanisms include: adjudication; conciliation; mediation; neutral evaluation; and informal mechanisms which may result into a negotiated settlement. The ELC can either adopt the court annexed ADR which is now part of the Kenyan legal system or refer the dispute to an appropriate ADR mechanism in agreement with the parties. Court annexed ADR is ADR process that is undertaken under the umbrella of the Court. Currently, court annexed mediation is now recognized under the Kenyan judicial system and the ELC can refer parties to the same for environmental disputes settlement.
The ELC can also refer parties to court annexed arbitration in tandem with the Arbitration Act, the CPA and the Civil Procedure Rules. The ELC can also refer the parties to an appropriate ADR process. In this scenario the environmental dispute is referred to an ADR entity. Parties can either agree to refer the matter to the ADR entity referred to or may choose another ADR entity which in their view is appropriate. In Kenya, the ADR entities include the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Dispute Resolution Centre and Mediation Training Institute, Strathmore Mediation and Dispute Resolution Centre and the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration. While parties are not forced to submit to these bodies and may choose an independent ADR expert, these bodies offer a forum through experience and expertise in solving disputes through ADR. In Kenya, we do not have an independent ADR entity which deals with environmental ADR only. This initiative can be considered in future by environmental stakeholders.
Stay of Legal Proceedings in Environmental ADR
Section 20(2) of the ELC allows the ELC to stay proceedings where ADR is a condition precedent to any proceedings before it. The essence of this provision is to ensure that where parties have agreed to resort to ADR in resolving environmental disputes, the ELC grants them the opportunity to reach a decision. If the aggrieved party wants to pursue their claims, then they must first exhaust the ADR mechanisms. Section 6 of the Arbitration Act requires the Court to stay legal proceedings where the dispute in question has been referred to arbitration. Section 6(3) of the Arbitration Act is very categorical that, if a Court does not stay the legal proceedings where arbitration is a condition precedent to any proceedings before it, then such proceedings will be of no effect. This maintains the status quo ensuring that the matter is subject to the ADR process.
This article is an extract from the Article “Alternative Dispute Resolution in Environmental Disputes: A Case of the Specialized Environment and Land Court in Kenya” by Renson Mulele Ingonga published in (2018) Journal of Conflict Management and Sustainable Development, Volume 2(1), edited by Dr. Kariuki Muigua, PhD. The references and citations of sources are available in the Journal article.