Connect with us

Lawyers

Definition and Regulation of Emergency Arbitration

Published

on

By Hon. Dr. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, C.Arb, FCIArb (Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Sustainable Development Policy Advisor, Natural Resources Lawyer and Dispute Resolution Expert from Kenya), The African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021, CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 and ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and Author of the Kenya’s First ESG Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) and and Kenya’s First Two Climate Change Law Book: Combating Climate Change for Sustainability (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023) and Achieving Climate Justice for Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023)*

Emergency arbitration is a special procedure whereby an arbitrator is appointed to hear applications for urgent interim relief(s) prior to the constitution of the Tribunal. Emergency arbitration or expedited measures of protection provide a framework for a party to an arbitration to request immediate though short-term reliefs before the process of appointment of an arbitral tribunal is completed. Under this process, emergency reliefs are sought upon the filing of the arbitration demand and may be compared to motions for injunctive relief or a temporary restraining order in court proceedings. Under emergency arbitration, an emergency arbitrator is appointed to hear and decide applications for emergency interim relief filed by parties before the constitution of the tribunal. Under this process, the person appointed as emergency arbitrator does not go on to become a member of the arbitral tribunal. The powers of the emergency arbitrator lapse as soon as the tribunal is constituted.

Emergency arbitration has emerged as a very important doctrine in enhancing the efficacy of arbitration proceedings. It has been argued that in some cases, the nature of a dispute requires immediate action to avoid irreparable harm. In traditional litigation, a party might seek a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction from a court to prevent another party from taking certain action. Further, it has been observed that until recently, parties to international arbitration agreements had no recourse to arbitration to preserve the status quo, conserve assets or evidence, or seek other provisional relief until a tribunal had been established in a particular case-a process that in the best of circumstances, took weeks after submission of a ‘request for arbitration’ or ‘notice of arbitration.’ To obtain provisional measures in such circumstances, parties were required to resort to national courts.

Emergency arbitration has therefore emerged in order to ensure that the grant of interim measures of protection is conducted within the confines of arbitration and not by national courts. It has been argued that some of the attributes of arbitration such as privacy, confidentiality and efficiency may be lost if a party is forced to pursue provisional reliefs in open court2. Some parties therefore prefer to seek interim measures within the arbitral process. Emergency arbitration is therefore vital in realizing the agreement of parties’ to arbitrate disputes.

Emergency arbitration is important as parties (typically Claimants) may find themselves in a factual situation where they are in need of urgent interim relief, but the tribunal has not yet been appointed. Recourse to emergency arbitration is particularly important when considering the amount of time the process of constituting a tribunal can take. This timeline may be substantially lengthened by an uncooperative Respondent who is determined to delay the proceedings to the Claimant’s detriment. Under emergency arbitration, any emergency measure granted takes the form of an order. The order may be later revisited by the arbitral tribunal once constituted.

Emergency arbitration has been adopted by various arbitral institutions to address the need for emergency interim reliefs at the pre-arbitral stage34. Under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules, 2021, a party that needs urgent interim or conservatory measures that cannot await the constitution of an arbitral tribunal (“Emergency Measures”) may make an application for such measures36. The Rules envisage the appointment of an emergency arbitrator within two days of receipt of the application. The rules further provide that the emergency arbitrator’s decision shall take the form of an order and that parties shall comply with any order made by the emergency arbitrator. The emergency arbitrator is required to make the order not later than 15 days from the date on which the file was transmitted to him/her.

In addition, the Rules provide that the emergency arbitrator’s order shall not bind the arbitral tribunal with respect to any question, issue or dispute determined in the order and that the arbitral tribunal may modify, terminate or annul the order or any modification thereto made by the emergency arbitrator40. The Rules also give powers to the arbitral tribunal to decide upon any party’s requests or claims related to the emergency arbitrator proceedings, including the reallocation of the costs of such proceedings and any claims arising out of or in connection with the compliance or noncompliance with the order. The Rules also provide that an emergency arbitrator shall not act as an arbitrator in any arbitration relating to the dispute that gave rise to the application.

Emergency arbitration is also provided for under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Arbitration Rules. The Rules provide that in the case of emergency at any time prior to the formation or expedited formation of the Arbitral Tribunal, any party may apply to the LCIA Court for the immediate appointment of a temporary sole arbitrator to conduct emergency proceedings pending the formation or expedited formation of the Arbitral Tribunal (the “Emergency Arbitrator”). The rules envisage appointment of an emergency arbitrator within three days of receipt of the application. The rules require the emergency arbitrator to decide the claim for emergency relief as soon as possible, but no later than 14 days following the appointment. An emergency arbitrator is required to make an order in writing, with reasons. Such an order may be confirmed, varied, discharged or revoked, in whole or in part, by order or award made by the Arbitral Tribunal upon application by any party or upon its own initiative.

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) Arbitration Rules also enshrine the doctrine of emergency arbitration. Under the Rules, any party in need of conservatory or urgent interim measures prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal may file an application with the CIArb seeking the appointment of an emergency arbitrator. The Rules stipulate that an application for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator may seek orders, including, but not limited to: maintaining or restoring the status quo pending the determination of the dispute; taking action that would prevent, or refrain from taking action that is likely to cause current or imminent harm or prejudice to the arbitral process itself; providing a means of preserving assets out of which a subsequent award may be satisfied; or preserving evidence that may be relevant and material to the resolution of the dispute.

The Rules require an emergency arbitrator to be appointed within two days of receipt of the application. Further, under the Rules, no emergency arbitrator may be appointed after the arbitral tribunal has been constituted. The Rules also require the emergency arbitrator to decide the issues raised in the application as soon as possible and preferably no later than 15 days following the appointment, taking due care to ensure that all parties are afforded notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Rules further state that any order or award issued by the emergency arbitrator, including an award of costs, may be modified or confirmed by the arbitral tribunal, and, in the absence of such a modification or confirmation, shall automatically expire and no longer be in effect 15 days following the constitution of the arbitral tribunal.

In addition, the Arbitration Rules of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) Court of Justice also provide for emergency arbitration. Under the rules, a party may apply for conservatory or urgent interim measures prior to the constitution of an arbitral tribunal by making a request to the Assigning Authority for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator. Under the emergency arbitration procedure, a request for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator may seek orders, including, but not limited to maintaining or restoring the status quo pending the determination of the dispute; taking action that would prevent, or refrain from taking action that is likely to cause current or imminent harm or prejudice to the arbitral process itself; providing a means of preserving assets out of which a subsequent award may be satisfied; or preserving evidence that may be relevant and material to the resolution of the dispute.

Like the CIArb Rules, the COMESA Rules also require an emergency arbitrator to be appointed within two days of receipt of the application and that no emergency arbitrator shall be appointed after the arbitral tribunal has been constituted. In addition, they stipulate that the emergency arbitrator shall not serve as a member of the arbitral tribunal unless the parties otherwise agree. The Rules further require the emergency arbitrator to decide the issues raised in the application no later than fifteen (15) days following the appointment, taking due care to ensure that all Parties are afforded notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

Further, under the rules, any order or award issued by the emergency arbitrator, including an award of costs may be modified or confirmed by the emergency arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal, and, in the absence of such a modification or confirmation, shall automatically expire and no longer be in effect fifteen (15) days following the constitution of the arbitral tribunal. In addition, the Rules also stipulate that the emergency arbitral order shall not bind the arbitral tribunal with respect to any question, issue or dispute determined in the order. The rules also give powers to the arbitral tribunal to modify, terminate or annul the order or any modification thereto made by the emergency arbitrator.

The doctrine of emergency arbitration is also upheld under the Kigali International Arbitration Centre Arbitration Rules which are similar to the COMESA Rules. Emergency arbitration has also been encapsulated under the Arbitration Rules of the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration. Under the Rules, a party who intends to make an application for an emergency arbitration shall submit a written request to the Registrar. The Registrar is required to appoint an emergency arbitrator within two days of receipt of the application. The Rules further stipulate that an emergency arbitrator may not act as an arbitrator in any future arbitration relating to the dispute, unless the parties consent. In addition, the Rules state that emergency arbitrator shall have the same powers vested in the Arbitral Tribunal under these Rules, including the power to rule on his own jurisdiction and any objection to the application. Further, the Rules provide that the emergency arbitrator shall make an order or award within fifteen days from the date of appointment, which period may be extended by agreement of the parties. From the foregoing, it is evident that emergency arbitration has been adopted by various arbitral institutions in similar lines to address the need for emergency interim reliefs before appointment of arbitral tribunals.

*This is an extract from the Article: (Re) Examining the Doctrine of Emergency Arbitration: ((2023) 12(1) Alternative Dispute Resolution by Hon. Dr. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhDSenior Advocate of Kenya, Chartered Arbitrator, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya), African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by Republic of Kenya and Member of National Environment Tribunal (NET). Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a Senior Lecturer of Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law and The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP). He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Dr. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates and Africa Trustee Emeritus of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2019-2022. Dr. Muigua is a 2023 recipient of President of the Republic of Kenya Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) Award for his service to the Nation as a Distinguished Expert, Academic and Scholar in Dispute Resolution and recognized among the top 5 leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts in Band 1 in Kenya by the Chambers Global Guide 2022 and was listed in the Inaugural THE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame 2023 as one of the Top 50 Most Distinguished Litigation Lawyers in Kenya and the Top Arbitrator in Kenya in 2023. 

References

American Arbitration Association., ‘ADR: What’s Your Emergency?’ Available at https://www.adr.org/blog/ADR-Whats-Your-Emergency (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Arbitration Rules of the COMESA Court of Justice (2018)., Available at https://comesacourt.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/COMESA-COURT-ARBITRATIONRULES-2018.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Burbeza. Z., ‘LCIA Emergency Arbitrations: Brief Outline.’ Available at https://imdcorporate.co.uk/dispute-resolution/lcia-emergency-arbitrations-briefoutline/ (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Arbitration Rules, 2015., Available at https://www.ciarb.org/media/2729/ciarb-arbitration-rules.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Hanessian. G, & Dosman. A., ‘ Songs of Innocence and Experience: Ten Years of Emergency Arbitration.’ Available at http://arbitrationlaw.com/sites/default/files/free_pdfs/aria_-_songs_of_access.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

International Chamber of Commerce., ‘Arbitration Rules, 2021’ Available at https://iccwbo.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/12/icc-2021-arbitration-rules-2014- mediation-rules-english-version.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

International Chamber of Commerce., ‘Emergency Arbitrator.’ Available at https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rulesprocedure/emergency-arbitrator/ (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Kigali International Arbitration Centre Arbitration Rules, 2012., Available at https://africaarbitration.org/resources/rules/Kigali%20International%20Arbitration%20Centr e%20Rules.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

London Court of International Arbitration., ‘Arbitration Rules.’ Available at https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2014.aspx (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration., Arbitration Rules, 2015., Available at https://ncia.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Final-NCIA-Revised-Rules-2019.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Norton Rose Fulbright., ‘Emergency Arbitrators in Singapore.’ Available at https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/0c310fce/emergencyarbitrators-in-singapore (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Singapore International Arbitration Centre., ‘Emergency Arbitration.’ Available at https://siac.org.sg/emergencyarbitration#:~:text=The%20Emergency%20Arbitrator%20procedure%20is,the%20constitutio n%20of%20the%20Tribunal (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Thrasher. A., ‘Emergency Arbitration Proceedings and How they Relate to Construction Disputes.’ Available at https://www.bradley.com/insights/publications/2023/05/emergency-arbitration-proceedingsand-how-they-relate-to-constructiondisputes#:~:text=Rule%20R%2D39%20under%20the,the%20application%20for%20eme rgency%20relief (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

admin@thelawyer.africa | Website | + posts

Lawyers

George Kashindi: Top Statesperson in Commercial Law in 2024

Published

on

By

Admin
George Kashindi, Partner at Munyao, Muthama & Kashindi Advocates and Member, Tax Appeals Tribunal

Partner, Munyao Muthama & Kashindi Advocates (MMK) & Member, Tax Appeals Tribunal.

  • Co-Author of Kashindis’ Digest of Employment Cases (Flamekeepers Publishing, Nairobi, 2020).
  • LLM (UoN)
  • LLB (Hons) UoN
  • Dip. Law (KSL)
  • Admitted 2002

Practice Areas

  • Taxation and Revenue
  • Regulatory and Compliance
  • Advisory and dispute resolution
  • Compliance and Governance Audits
  • Public Procurement
  • Civil and Commercial Litigation
  • Arbitration
  • Energy and Natural Resources
  • Constitutional Law
  • Judicial Review
  • Employment and Labour Relations

Biography

George is an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya with over 22 years of experience. He is a Partner of Munyao, Muthama & Kashindi Advocates (MMK Advocates) previously in charge of the Nairobi office (now on sabbatical) and Member of Tax Appeals Tribunal. George started his legal career in the well- known firm of Rachier and Amollo where he gained a wealth of experience in a broad spectrum of legal matters. Subsequent to leaving Rachier & Amollo, George trained at the Kenya Revenue Authority Training Institute for 2 years and thereafter worked at Kenya Revenue Authority as Senior Legal Counsel for 5 years. With this background, George has a very solid understanding of the tax policy and legislative framework and has many years’ experience in litigation, tax dispute resolution, tax investigations and prosecutions, interpretation of the tax statutes and advising on tax policy and legislation. He possesses a wealth of knowledge in dealings with senior revenue and treasury officials. He holds an LLM in Financial Services with a specialisation in tax and has acted in a number of jurisprudence setting tax matters.

George has extensive experience in regulatory and compliance advisory and litigation and has acted for a number of Kenya’s leading regulators including the Kenya Airports Authority, Communication Authority, Agriculture Food Authority, Energy Regulatory Commission, Kenya Forest Service, Engineers Board of Kenya, National Transport and Safety Authority, NGOs Coordination Board, Kenya Civil Aviation Authority, National Hospital Insurance Fund to name but a few. He is well versed in regulatory law and practice, compliance and governance matters.

George has extensive experience in conducting legal, regulatory, compliance and governance audits and is respected in this field as a leading expert. He has conducted the audits on blue chip companies listed in the bourse, leading corporates, parastatals and other government entities among other clients. His previous and existing clients include Safaricom, Post Bank, Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen), National Hospital Insurance Fund, and Technical University of Mombasa among others. The highly rated Legal, Compliance and Governance Audit practice headed by George is accredited by the Law Society of Kenya.

George also advises clients on public procurement, NGOs and Charities law, employment and labour relations, energy and natural resources, immigration among others. He is also in charge of running training portfolio of the firm.

Educational and professional qualifications

  • Bachelor of Laws, University of Nairobi 2000
  • Diploma in Law, Kenya School of Law 2001
  • Admitted as an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya, 2002
  • Masters Degree in law (Financial Services Law), University of Nairobi 2017

Membership in professional associations

  • Law Society of Kenya

Career history

  • Pupilage: Rachier & Company Advocates, 2000-2001
  • Management Trainee: Kenya Revenue Authority Training Institute, 2001-2002
  • Senior Legal Counsel: Kenya Revenue Authority, 2002-2007
  • Partner: Munyao, Muthama & Kashindi- 2009 to date

Work Highlights

Legal, governance, compliance, regulatory audits.

  • Team leader in conducting legal, compliance and regulatory audits which entail  It reviewed the client’s internal policies, practices and operations of the governing bodies and various departments to assess their compliance with the relevant laws including the Constitution, the establishing  and regulating statutes and subsidiary legislation. The previous and existing clients include Safaricom, Post Bank, Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen), National Hospital Insurance Fund, and Technical University of Mombasa, Kenya Literature Bureau, Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Post Office Savings Bank among others.
  • Team leader in reviewing the legal and policy frameworks to strengthen integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) in Kenya
  • Team leader of the corporate governance practice area and has been involved in reviewing clients’ corporate governance structures and giving advice on legal, compliance and governance requirements. He has offered tailor made presentations and training sessions to clients’ board members and senior executives on corporate governance and other applicable legal and compliance requirements.
  • Advised clients on risk assessment and implementation of risk mitigating measures relating but not limited to directors duties, anti-corruption/bribery, anti-money laundering among others.

Tax

  • Assisted a leading audit firm in challenging a tax assessment raised by KRA in excess ofKshs 600,000 million against an international NGO operating in the Kenya and the region. The case involved complex legal points relating to expatriate tax, installment tax, definition and meaning of residency and interpretation of a number of statutory provisions.
  • Acted for one of the largest Container Freight Terminals in Mombasa that had been shut down by the Commissioner of Customs Services after a huge assessment of tax. The case successfully challenged the Commissioner of Custom’s power to close the facility and addressed other complex customs legal issues.
  • Represented one of the largest private universities in successfully pursuing a waiver of tax penalties and interest resulting from an initial assessment of tax by KRA amounting to KShs. 70 million.
  • Represented a leading company operating in the horticultural sector in appealing a tax assessment of over Kshs 200 million.
  • Represented a leading Italian company headquartered in Rome Italy running a space research project in Malindi to successfully challenge enforcement action by KRA of freezing the company’s bank accounts. The case addressed developing jurisprudence of striking a proper balance between the enforcement powers of the tax man viv a vis the need to protect a tax payer from the risk of substantial hardship including total collapse due to enforcement action. The court was persuaded to set aside an earlier order for the client to furnish security of a substantial amount and granted an unconditional stay of enforcement action. The monetary exposure was over Kshs 160 million.
  • Represented a leading export trading company in challenging tax assessment in excess of Ksh 300 million and dealing with complex tax issues touching on various WTO rules including the non-discrimination principle, rules of origin, East African Common tariff classification, and an array of constitutional and administrative law issues.

Regulatory advisory and dispute resolution

  • Representing and advising an array of regulators of various sectors and public bodies on a wide range of issues and claims airing from their exercise of their regulatory and statutory mandates. Kenya Airports Authority, Communication Authority, Agriculture Food Authority, Energy Regulatory Commission, Kenya Forest Service, Engineers Board of Kenya, National Transport and Safety Authority, NGOs Coordination Board, Kenya Civil Aviation Authority, National Hospital Insurance Fund to name but a few.

Energy

  • Represented a regulator in the energy sector against representative/class action public interest and consumer protection related claims made against the regulator and other players in the sector concerning several issues touching on electric power billing tariffs among other issues.  The value of some of the matters in contention is over Kshs 10 billion.
  • Representing a regulator in the energy sector against a representative/class action public interest and consumer protection related claims made against the regulator and other government agencies touching on key issues in the energy sector such as power generation, power purchase agreements, deemed energy, financing of power generation projects, Government guarantees, electricity transmission and an array of constitutional issues. The value of the matters under consideration is over Kshs 100 billion.
  • Team leader in conducting a legal and regulatory audit of a leading player in the energy sector. The audit included visiting critical their installations across the country, reviewing local and international contractual agreements, advising on Power Purchase Agreements, reviewing board and management operations, identifying and advising on legal risks.  
  • Acted for a Government entity operating in the energy sector in responding to compliance summons issued by a County Government relating to their installations within the county.
  • Acted for a company operating in the geothermal sector in defending a contractual claim of substantial amount of money relating to a multi-lateral donor- funded project for drilling and extraction of steam through the innovative well-head technology.

Public Procurement

  • Represented a leading Chinese firm which was a successful bidder in a multi-billion donor funded project for the Water and Sanitation Improvement project awarded by one of the public bodies operating in the water sector, in successfully opposing a challenge instituted by a losing bidder before the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board. The matter involved key procurement issues and jurisprudence touching on among other things, locus standi of applicants in a joint venture.
  • Representing the same Chinese firm in separate proceedings instituted by a different bidder but relating to the same award. Acted for the firm both before the Administrative Review Board and the High Court. The cases addressed notable public procurement matters including the Board’s jurisdiction in disputes emanating from donor funded projects and projects the subject to negotiated grants.
  • Represented a leading supplier and retailer of tyres and accessories before the Public Procurement and Appeals Review Board in dispute relating to a multi-million tender awarded by a public body in based in Mombasa and operating in the ports sector. The challenge succeeded before the Board but was subsequently overturned on appeal to the High Court.

Non-Governmental and Charities

  • Retained by several charitable, not for profit and religious organisations on an array of issues ranging from registration processes and documentation, regulatory compliance, tax advice, labour law matters, court representation and advice on contracting processes. Such NGOs include but not limited to Helpage, International Republican Institute, Food For the Hungry among others.

Employment and labour relations

  • Represented and advised an array of clients drawn from various sectors in a wide range of employment and labour related matters including representations in court, drafting of employee contracts, drafting and reviewing polices and manuals, advice on termination, dismissals,  redundancies and restructuring, managing employee-exists, advice on collective bargaining and negotiations, secondment, outsourcing among others.

Continue Reading

Lawyers

Josephine L.M. Righa: Hall of Fame Commercial Lawyer in 2024

Published

on

By

Admin
Josephine L.M. Righa is the Managing Partner of Josephine Righa Advocates.

Josephine L.M. Righa, the Managing Partner of Josephine Righa Advocates, has over 15 years of commercial and corporate law experience and was nominated as the Commercial Practitioner of the year 2023 at the Nairobi Legal Awards. She is listed in THE LAWYER AFRICA Commercial Lawyers Hall of Fame 2024 for her exemplary performance as a commercial lawyer acting for and representing top firms and businesses over the years. Previously, she was listed among the Top 100 Commercial Lawyers in Kenya in 2023.

Josephine has all round experience in commercial and corporate law gained from working as an in-house lawyer for a leading multinational, rising through the ranks from junior associate to the head of commercial and corporate law department of a leading law firm and founding her own commercial law boutique firm serving leading commercial clients and handling high value business transactions.

Josephine graduated in the year 2008 with a Bachelors of Laws Degree from the Catholic University of Eastern Africa and commenced working as legal assistant for Coca-Cola Central East & West Africa Limited from the years 2009. In the year 2011, Ms. Righa pursued her Bar studies and now holds a Post-Graduate Diploma in Law from Kenya School of Law.

She did her pupillage with the firm of Igeria and Ngugi Advocates and was promoted to Associate position upon her admission to the Bar in the year 2012. In the year 2014, she was promoted as a Senior Associate and the head of the Corporate and Commercial Practice of the firm, a position she held until July 2019. She founded Josephine Righa Advocates, a leading commercial and corporate law boutique in Kenya, where she serves as the Principal and Managing Partner

In addition she is a notary public, commissioner for oaths, a registered Patent Agent of the Kenya Intellectual Property Institute and is currently pursuing a Certified Public Secretaries (CPS) certification. She is also certified professional trainer in Legal Audits and Compliance, Corporate Governance, Private Public Partnerships and Contract Management & Administration (specifically trained on Contract Negotiation, Contract Drafting and review, Changes and Variations in Contracts, Dispute Avoidance & Resolution and Contract Administration Overview).

Josephine is keen on corporate governance issues and having been professionally trained by the Centre for Corporate Governance (CCG) Kenya and the Institute of Directors (IOD), Kenya, she now is an Associate Member of IOD-Kenya. Further, she is a certified professional mediator having been professionally trained by Mediation Training Institute (I) East Africa to mediate disputes in a variety of spheres including but not limited to commercial, workplace, community and family disputes.

Continue Reading

Lawyers

Mwangi Kibicho: Top Statesperson in Commercial Law in 2024

Published

on

By

Admin
Mwangi Kibicho, Managing Partner of J.K. Kibocho & Co. Advocates and Top Commercial Lawyer in Kenya

Practice Areas:
Dispute Resolution, Commercial & Corporate Law.

Membership in professional societies:
Law Society of Kenya
East Africa Law Society

Email: mwangi@jkkibicho.co.ke

Credentials:
• MBA – Global Business Management (MBA – GBM), United States International University (USIU)
• Postgraduate Diploma in law, Kenya School of Law.
• Bachelor of Laws, LL.B (Hons), Moi University.

Mwangi Kibicho is a consummate and versatile advocate with a wealth of experience in legal matters. He demonstrates dynamism in his hands – on approach to the law. Having been in the legal practice since 2002, when he joined J.K. Kibicho & Advocates, he has risen through the ranks to the position of Managing Partner.

Work Experience

  • Advising a multinational corporation, which intended to invest in the lending pool in Kenya, on the legal aspects of off-shore lending and the legal procedures and structures on microfinance in Kenya.
  • Acting for a company in the transfer of 1,000 acres of its land in Naivasha to the Government of Kenya for the development of an industrial park being part of the Government’s targeted key elements of infrastructural growth.
  • Advising one of the first Drone Clubs in Kenya in registration of the drones, to engaging with several Kenya Civil Aviation officials for authorization and holding discussions on the proposed legal regulations of drones in Kenya.
  • Advising a client on the incorporation of its leading mortgage association in the country, engaging various stakeholders in the mortgage industry, and advising the client on the legal structures and impact of the same as well as making recommendations on the implementation of the association’s objectives.
  • Acting for a company in advising and preparing documentation for transfer of more than 10,000 acres of its land to its shareholders as non-cash dividends.
  • Acting for the leading management agency for small scale tea farmers in Kenya in their hydropower projects in various parts of the country, advising on project management analysis and review, engaging the involved stakeholders on the project execution, preparing and perfecting the necessary documentation.
  • Conducting high level research and advising a client in preparation of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Turkana County Government and a limited liability company incorporated in Kenya for exploration and development of the Barrier Volcanic Complex Geothermal in Turkana County, Katilia Ward.
  • Preparation, negotiation and registration of residential and commercial leases for various developments in the country.
  • Drafting and conducting high level negotiations of various contracts.
  • Attending to registration of trademarks for several large companies and individuals.
  • Advise and facilitating one of our major clients seeking to establish a Public Private Partnership on the government’s Affordable Housing Programme (AHP).
  • Conducting research and opinion writing to clients on various legal matters.
  • Setting up both internal and external legal and practice trainings as well as presentations.
  • Participating in the Commercial Practice Committee under the LSK, Nairobi Branch which seeks to set up proper practice standards related to Commercial law in Kenya and championing for harmonisation of the laws related to the same.
  • Participating in the Lands Registry Liaison Committee under the LSK, Nairobi Branch which seeks to identify and resolve the issues in the lands registries.

Continue Reading

Trending