Connect with us

Lawyers

Definition and Regulation of Emergency Arbitration

Published

on

By Hon. Dr. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, C.Arb, FCIArb (Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Sustainable Development Policy Advisor, Natural Resources Lawyer and Dispute Resolution Expert from Kenya), The African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021, CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 and ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and Author of the Kenya’s First ESG Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) and and Kenya’s First Two Climate Change Law Book: Combating Climate Change for Sustainability (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023) and Achieving Climate Justice for Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023)*

Emergency arbitration is a special procedure whereby an arbitrator is appointed to hear applications for urgent interim relief(s) prior to the constitution of the Tribunal. Emergency arbitration or expedited measures of protection provide a framework for a party to an arbitration to request immediate though short-term reliefs before the process of appointment of an arbitral tribunal is completed. Under this process, emergency reliefs are sought upon the filing of the arbitration demand and may be compared to motions for injunctive relief or a temporary restraining order in court proceedings. Under emergency arbitration, an emergency arbitrator is appointed to hear and decide applications for emergency interim relief filed by parties before the constitution of the tribunal. Under this process, the person appointed as emergency arbitrator does not go on to become a member of the arbitral tribunal. The powers of the emergency arbitrator lapse as soon as the tribunal is constituted.

Emergency arbitration has emerged as a very important doctrine in enhancing the efficacy of arbitration proceedings. It has been argued that in some cases, the nature of a dispute requires immediate action to avoid irreparable harm. In traditional litigation, a party might seek a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction from a court to prevent another party from taking certain action. Further, it has been observed that until recently, parties to international arbitration agreements had no recourse to arbitration to preserve the status quo, conserve assets or evidence, or seek other provisional relief until a tribunal had been established in a particular case-a process that in the best of circumstances, took weeks after submission of a ‘request for arbitration’ or ‘notice of arbitration.’ To obtain provisional measures in such circumstances, parties were required to resort to national courts.

Emergency arbitration has therefore emerged in order to ensure that the grant of interim measures of protection is conducted within the confines of arbitration and not by national courts. It has been argued that some of the attributes of arbitration such as privacy, confidentiality and efficiency may be lost if a party is forced to pursue provisional reliefs in open court2. Some parties therefore prefer to seek interim measures within the arbitral process. Emergency arbitration is therefore vital in realizing the agreement of parties’ to arbitrate disputes.

Emergency arbitration is important as parties (typically Claimants) may find themselves in a factual situation where they are in need of urgent interim relief, but the tribunal has not yet been appointed. Recourse to emergency arbitration is particularly important when considering the amount of time the process of constituting a tribunal can take. This timeline may be substantially lengthened by an uncooperative Respondent who is determined to delay the proceedings to the Claimant’s detriment. Under emergency arbitration, any emergency measure granted takes the form of an order. The order may be later revisited by the arbitral tribunal once constituted.

Emergency arbitration has been adopted by various arbitral institutions to address the need for emergency interim reliefs at the pre-arbitral stage34. Under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules, 2021, a party that needs urgent interim or conservatory measures that cannot await the constitution of an arbitral tribunal (“Emergency Measures”) may make an application for such measures36. The Rules envisage the appointment of an emergency arbitrator within two days of receipt of the application. The rules further provide that the emergency arbitrator’s decision shall take the form of an order and that parties shall comply with any order made by the emergency arbitrator. The emergency arbitrator is required to make the order not later than 15 days from the date on which the file was transmitted to him/her.

In addition, the Rules provide that the emergency arbitrator’s order shall not bind the arbitral tribunal with respect to any question, issue or dispute determined in the order and that the arbitral tribunal may modify, terminate or annul the order or any modification thereto made by the emergency arbitrator40. The Rules also give powers to the arbitral tribunal to decide upon any party’s requests or claims related to the emergency arbitrator proceedings, including the reallocation of the costs of such proceedings and any claims arising out of or in connection with the compliance or noncompliance with the order. The Rules also provide that an emergency arbitrator shall not act as an arbitrator in any arbitration relating to the dispute that gave rise to the application.

Emergency arbitration is also provided for under the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Arbitration Rules. The Rules provide that in the case of emergency at any time prior to the formation or expedited formation of the Arbitral Tribunal, any party may apply to the LCIA Court for the immediate appointment of a temporary sole arbitrator to conduct emergency proceedings pending the formation or expedited formation of the Arbitral Tribunal (the “Emergency Arbitrator”). The rules envisage appointment of an emergency arbitrator within three days of receipt of the application. The rules require the emergency arbitrator to decide the claim for emergency relief as soon as possible, but no later than 14 days following the appointment. An emergency arbitrator is required to make an order in writing, with reasons. Such an order may be confirmed, varied, discharged or revoked, in whole or in part, by order or award made by the Arbitral Tribunal upon application by any party or upon its own initiative.

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) Arbitration Rules also enshrine the doctrine of emergency arbitration. Under the Rules, any party in need of conservatory or urgent interim measures prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal may file an application with the CIArb seeking the appointment of an emergency arbitrator. The Rules stipulate that an application for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator may seek orders, including, but not limited to: maintaining or restoring the status quo pending the determination of the dispute; taking action that would prevent, or refrain from taking action that is likely to cause current or imminent harm or prejudice to the arbitral process itself; providing a means of preserving assets out of which a subsequent award may be satisfied; or preserving evidence that may be relevant and material to the resolution of the dispute.

The Rules require an emergency arbitrator to be appointed within two days of receipt of the application. Further, under the Rules, no emergency arbitrator may be appointed after the arbitral tribunal has been constituted. The Rules also require the emergency arbitrator to decide the issues raised in the application as soon as possible and preferably no later than 15 days following the appointment, taking due care to ensure that all parties are afforded notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Rules further state that any order or award issued by the emergency arbitrator, including an award of costs, may be modified or confirmed by the arbitral tribunal, and, in the absence of such a modification or confirmation, shall automatically expire and no longer be in effect 15 days following the constitution of the arbitral tribunal.

In addition, the Arbitration Rules of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) Court of Justice also provide for emergency arbitration. Under the rules, a party may apply for conservatory or urgent interim measures prior to the constitution of an arbitral tribunal by making a request to the Assigning Authority for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator. Under the emergency arbitration procedure, a request for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator may seek orders, including, but not limited to maintaining or restoring the status quo pending the determination of the dispute; taking action that would prevent, or refrain from taking action that is likely to cause current or imminent harm or prejudice to the arbitral process itself; providing a means of preserving assets out of which a subsequent award may be satisfied; or preserving evidence that may be relevant and material to the resolution of the dispute.

Like the CIArb Rules, the COMESA Rules also require an emergency arbitrator to be appointed within two days of receipt of the application and that no emergency arbitrator shall be appointed after the arbitral tribunal has been constituted. In addition, they stipulate that the emergency arbitrator shall not serve as a member of the arbitral tribunal unless the parties otherwise agree. The Rules further require the emergency arbitrator to decide the issues raised in the application no later than fifteen (15) days following the appointment, taking due care to ensure that all Parties are afforded notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

Further, under the rules, any order or award issued by the emergency arbitrator, including an award of costs may be modified or confirmed by the emergency arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal, and, in the absence of such a modification or confirmation, shall automatically expire and no longer be in effect fifteen (15) days following the constitution of the arbitral tribunal. In addition, the Rules also stipulate that the emergency arbitral order shall not bind the arbitral tribunal with respect to any question, issue or dispute determined in the order. The rules also give powers to the arbitral tribunal to modify, terminate or annul the order or any modification thereto made by the emergency arbitrator.

The doctrine of emergency arbitration is also upheld under the Kigali International Arbitration Centre Arbitration Rules which are similar to the COMESA Rules. Emergency arbitration has also been encapsulated under the Arbitration Rules of the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration. Under the Rules, a party who intends to make an application for an emergency arbitration shall submit a written request to the Registrar. The Registrar is required to appoint an emergency arbitrator within two days of receipt of the application. The Rules further stipulate that an emergency arbitrator may not act as an arbitrator in any future arbitration relating to the dispute, unless the parties consent. In addition, the Rules state that emergency arbitrator shall have the same powers vested in the Arbitral Tribunal under these Rules, including the power to rule on his own jurisdiction and any objection to the application. Further, the Rules provide that the emergency arbitrator shall make an order or award within fifteen days from the date of appointment, which period may be extended by agreement of the parties. From the foregoing, it is evident that emergency arbitration has been adopted by various arbitral institutions in similar lines to address the need for emergency interim reliefs before appointment of arbitral tribunals.

*This is an extract from the Article: (Re) Examining the Doctrine of Emergency Arbitration: ((2023) 12(1) Alternative Dispute Resolution by Hon. Dr. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhDSenior Advocate of Kenya, Chartered Arbitrator, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya), African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by Republic of Kenya and Member of National Environment Tribunal (NET). Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Dr. Kariuki Muigua is a Senior Lecturer of Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law and The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP). He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Dr. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates and Africa Trustee Emeritus of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2019-2022. Dr. Muigua is a 2023 recipient of President of the Republic of Kenya Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) Award for his service to the Nation as a Distinguished Expert, Academic and Scholar in Dispute Resolution and recognized among the top 5 leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts in Band 1 in Kenya by the Chambers Global Guide 2022 and was listed in the Inaugural THE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame 2023 as one of the Top 50 Most Distinguished Litigation Lawyers in Kenya and the Top Arbitrator in Kenya in 2023. 

References

American Arbitration Association., ‘ADR: What’s Your Emergency?’ Available at https://www.adr.org/blog/ADR-Whats-Your-Emergency (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Arbitration Rules of the COMESA Court of Justice (2018)., Available at https://comesacourt.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/COMESA-COURT-ARBITRATIONRULES-2018.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Burbeza. Z., ‘LCIA Emergency Arbitrations: Brief Outline.’ Available at https://imdcorporate.co.uk/dispute-resolution/lcia-emergency-arbitrations-briefoutline/ (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Arbitration Rules, 2015., Available at https://www.ciarb.org/media/2729/ciarb-arbitration-rules.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Hanessian. G, & Dosman. A., ‘ Songs of Innocence and Experience: Ten Years of Emergency Arbitration.’ Available at http://arbitrationlaw.com/sites/default/files/free_pdfs/aria_-_songs_of_access.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

International Chamber of Commerce., ‘Arbitration Rules, 2021’ Available at https://iccwbo.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/12/icc-2021-arbitration-rules-2014- mediation-rules-english-version.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

International Chamber of Commerce., ‘Emergency Arbitrator.’ Available at https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rulesprocedure/emergency-arbitrator/ (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Kigali International Arbitration Centre Arbitration Rules, 2012., Available at https://africaarbitration.org/resources/rules/Kigali%20International%20Arbitration%20Centr e%20Rules.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

London Court of International Arbitration., ‘Arbitration Rules.’ Available at https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2014.aspx (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration., Arbitration Rules, 2015., Available at https://ncia.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Final-NCIA-Revised-Rules-2019.pdf (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Norton Rose Fulbright., ‘Emergency Arbitrators in Singapore.’ Available at https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/0c310fce/emergencyarbitrators-in-singapore (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Singapore International Arbitration Centre., ‘Emergency Arbitration.’ Available at https://siac.org.sg/emergencyarbitration#:~:text=The%20Emergency%20Arbitrator%20procedure%20is,the%20constitutio n%20of%20the%20Tribunal (Accessed on 29/08/2023).

Thrasher. A., ‘Emergency Arbitration Proceedings and How they Relate to Construction Disputes.’ Available at https://www.bradley.com/insights/publications/2023/05/emergency-arbitration-proceedingsand-how-they-relate-to-constructiondisputes#:~:text=Rule%20R%2D39%20under%20the,the%20application%20for%20eme rgency%20relief (Accessed on 29/08/2023)

Lawyers

Njoki Mboce: I am Members Project for LSK President

Published

on

By

By Njoki Mboce for LSK President 2024-2026 Team

Today, LSK faces an existential threat from those who seek to compromise its mandate by aligning with the regime in ongoing attempts to undermine the place of the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) and erode the Rule of Law. This has the potential to regress the country to a state of impunity and dictatorship reminiscent of the past.

In such turbulent times, the LSK requires a leader who is resolute, decisive, and impartial. Harriet Njoki Mboce is this suitable leader, with a firm reputation, who will speak Truth to power in the face of encroaching dictatorship.

The actions of a candidate are a mirror of who they are, and what they will be in office. If a candidate wants the office at all costs, and abuses members’ trust to get there, they will have no integrity while in office. Harriet Njoki Mboce is unequivocally the LSK Members’ project. Boldly and firmly acting to defend Independence of the BAR, institutions, and the Rule of Law, she has maintained this commitment throughout her campaigns for President of LSK. This offers a strong basis to fearlessly champion members’ interests and protect the BAR from capture by the State and unscrupulous cartels.

Growing up, I dreamt of being a Navy Officer. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that I would one day be seeking the Presidency of an organisation previously led by impeccable names such as SC Gibson Kamau Kuria, SC Pheroze Nowrojee, SC Paul Muite, SC Hon Dr. Willy Mutunga (CJ Emeritus) and SC Raychelle Omamo, among others. It has taken resilience and a high dose of firm, and bold commitment to get here.

LSK requires a leader to withstand the pressure within and without, and to take the heat on behalf of the membership, whenever the Country and the Society’s living tenets come under threat. This resilience as a quality in the President of LSK enables me in a big way to see the wider horizon of the environment we operate in, to prepare for the storms and to boldly and firmly focus and act on our bigger mandate.

Come elections day, 29th February, 2024, I invite members to ask themselves: Which candidate shows real signs that they will not be corrupted, will run an accountable organisation and will sustain the moral and probity to place the LSK on a path of Independence? I humbly seek your vote to bring this desire home. Please vote for the Member’s project, Harriet Njoki Mboce, HSC for President of The Law Society of Kenya (2024-2026)

Continue Reading

Lawyers

Way Forward in Ensuring Just Transition in Climate Justice

Published

on

By

By Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, C.Arb, FCIArb is a Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution at the University of Nairobi, Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration, Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Respected Sustainable Development Policy Advisor, Top Natural Resources Lawyer, Highly-Regarded Dispute Resolution Expert and Awardee of the Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) of Kenya by H.E. the President of Republic of Kenya. He is The African ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, The African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, ADR Practitioner of the Year in Kenya 2021, CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 and ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and Author of the Kenya’s First ESG Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) and Kenya’s First Two Climate Change Law Book: Combating Climate Change for Sustainability (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023), Achieving Climate Justice for Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023) and Promoting Rule of Law for Sustainable Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, January 2024)*

In order to embrace just transition, it is imperative to build a climate resilient and integrated sustainable energy sector in Africa and other regions which are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. It has been observed that Africa has rich energy and mineral resources including lithium, graphite, cobalt, nickel, copper, and rare earth minerals all of which provide new market opportunities for the green transition. This coupled with the Continent’s renewable energy potential means that Africa has the capacity to achieve just transition to an equitable and inclusive low-carbon future.

It has correctly been observed that Africa has immense potential for renewable energy including wind, solar, hydro, bioenergy, ocean tidal waves, geothermal among other renewables. It has been pointed out that in order to ensure delivery of global climate change mitigation goals, developing countries will need to drive investment towards building a renewable energy infrastructure that can serve their populations into the future and not drive further climate breakdown.

A just transition promotes the shift towards renewable sources of energy and sustainable practices, reducing the reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating the impacts of climate change. It is therefore important for developing countries to embrace just transition by promoting renewable sources of energy in order to achieve climate justice and energy justice. It is also essential to integrate just transition initiatives in national climate action plans and adaptation plans.

It has been observed that the importance of just transition is increasingly being recognized by governments worldwide as they cite just transition principles in their short- and long-term climate plans known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Long-Term Strategies (LTSs). Embedding just transition strategies within short and long term climate plans like NDCs and LTS, can help governments stay focused on the urgent task at hand of rapid decarbonization, while also striving for fair and inclusive outcomes.

In Kenya, the National Climate Change Action Plan enshrines the principles of just transition and seeks to foster an equitable and inclusive climate response which ensures an electricity supply mix based mainly on renewable energy that is resilient to climate change and promotes energy efficiency; encourage the transition to clean cooking that reduces the demand for biomass; and reduced exposure and vulnerability of the country, and especially of the poor and vulnerable groups, to climate disasters and shocks. It is therefore necessary for countries to incorporate just transition initiatives in their NDCs and LTSs in order to achieve efficient climate outcomes. This will demonstrate commitment towards achieving climate justice while securing public support for ambitious and stronger climate action.

Further, there is need to unlock and align climate finance with the idea of just transition. It has been argued that governments have an obligation to mobilize sustainable, affordable, predictable and long-term finance from public and private, domestic and international sources, and aligning public and private financial flows and public procurement to the objectives of a just transition. According to the UNFCCC, increased climate finance is needed to effectively address the challenges and seize the opportunities of just transitions in country-specific and sector-specific pathways considering the local circumstances.

Climate finance has been identified as a key tool towards fostering climate justice since it recognizes the inequalities between countries with developing countries being the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change and thus requiring financial resources to aid their mitigation and adaptation programmes86. It is therefore imperative for all countries and especially developing countries to unlock climate finance from multiple sources including public, private and multilateral sources in order to achieve just transition by addressing the socio-economic impacts of climate change and addressing climate inequalities more broadly through efficient mitigation and adaptation strategies.

In addition, it is necessary to embrace and enhance technology transfer between developed and developing countries in order to enhance the capacity of the former to later to embrace just transition. It has been pointed out that developing countries have vast renewable potential, but are unable to realize it as long as they are constrained by lack of access to green technologies. Without access to environmentally sound technologies, developing countries in particular least developed countries, will not be able to meet mitigation targets and will be forced to continue using carbon-intensive technologies resulting in climate and sustainability concerns.

Transferring low-carbon and green technologies to those most at risk of climate crisis is critical, among a range of other measures, to ensure that people can respond and adapt to the threat of climate change. Technology transfer can support the climate agenda in developing countries for energy and other sectoral transitions.

The Paris Agreement acknowledges the importance of technology for the implementation of mitigation and adaptation actions and urges countries to promote and facilitate enhanced action on technology development and transfer in order to support the implementation of the Agreement. It is thus pertinent for developed countries to promote transfer of low-carbon technologies including green technologies in developing countries in order to support climate action in such countries.

Developing countries should on the other hand remove barriers to green technology transfer including Intellectual Property barriers and revise bilateral and multilateral trade agreements that present a barrier to transfer initiatives. Finally, there is need to foster capacity building in order to effectively realize just transition. One of the key challenges in achieving climate justice through just transition has been identified to be inadequate national capacity on just transition initiatives.

Capacity building can strengthen individual and institutional capacities on just transition in key areas such as policymaking, cross-sectoral coordination, and stakeholder participation. It can further enhance the ability of the public to be involved in key decisions in the journey towards just transition. It has been pointed out that participation and engagement are crucial for achieving just sustainability transitions.

Capacity building is therefore integral in achieving just transition. It is thus necessary for all countries and especially developing states to strengthen their legal, institutional, technical, human, social and financial capacity in order to embrace just transition. The above among other measures are necessary in order to achieve equitable and inclusive just transition towards climate justice.

*This is an extract from the Book: Promoting Rule of Law for Sustainable Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, January 2024) by Hon. Prof.  Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution, Senior Advocate of Kenya, Chartered Arbitrator, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya), African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, Member of National Environment Tribunal (NET) Emeritus (2017 to 2023) and Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by Republic of Kenya. Prof. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Prof. Kariuki Muigua teaches Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law, The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP) and Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies. He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Prof. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates and Africa Trustee Emeritus of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2019-2022. Prof. Muigua is a 2023 recipient of President of the Republic of Kenya Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) Award for his service to the Nation as a Distinguished Expert, Academic and Scholar in Dispute Resolution and recognized among the top 5 leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts in Band 1 in Kenya by the Chambers Global Guide 2024 and was listed in the Inaugural THE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame 2023 as one of the Top 50 Most Distinguished Litigation Lawyers in Kenya and the Top Arbitrator in Kenya in 2023.

References

Africa Union., ‘Agenda 2063: The Africa we Want.’ Available at https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/33126- docframework_document_book.pdf (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

African Development Bank Group., ‘Just Transition Initiative to Address Climate Change in the African Context.’ Available at https://www.afdb.org/en/topics-andsectors/initiatives-partnerships/climate-investment-funds-cif/just-transitioninitiative (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Climate Policy., ‘Just Transition and Climate Justice.’ Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/tcpo20/collections/Just-Transition-andClimate-Justice (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Colenbrander. S et al., ‘Using Climate Finance to Advance Climate Justice: The Politics and Practice of Channeling Resources to the Local Level.’ Climate Policy, 2017.

European Commission., ‘The Just Transition Mechanism: Making Sure no One is Left Behind.’ Available at https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities2019-2024/european-green-deal/finance-and-green-deal/just-transition-mechanism_en (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

European Environment Agency., ‘The Case for Public Participation in Sustainability Transitions.’ Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/the-case-forpublic-participation (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Giles, M., ‘The Principles of Climate Justice at CoP27.’ Available at https://earth.org/principlesofclimatejustice/#:~:text=That%20response%20should %20be%20based,the %20consequences%20of%20clim ate%20change (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

Government of Kenya., ‘National Climate Change Action Plan (Kenya): 2018-2022.’ Nairobi: Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2018)., Available at https://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/8737.pdf (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

International Institute for Sustainable Development., ‘Rethinking Technology Transfer to Support the Climate Agenda.’ Available at https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/rethinking-technology-transfer-to-supportthe-climate-agenda/ (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

International Labour Organization., ‘Frequently Asked Questions on Just Transition.’ Available at https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/greenjobs/WCMS_824102/lang–en/index.htm (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

International Organization of Employers., ‘Climate Change and Just Transition.’ Available at https://www.ioe-emp.org/policy-priorities/climate-change-and-just-transitions (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Kemei. N., ‘Navigating the Path of Just Transition: Kenya’s Sustainable Future.’ Available at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/navigating-path-just-transitionkenyas-sustainable-future-naomikemei/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&utm_campaign=share _via (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Lee. S., ‘Unpacking Just Transition: What is it and How Can We Achieve it in Africa?.’ Available at https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/unpacking-justtransition-what-it-and-how-can-we-achieve-itafrica?gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI7ufGuYrpggMVboVoCR2gtAn3EAAYASAAE gL8VvD_BwE (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

McCauley. D., & Heffron. R., ‘Just Transition: Integrating Climate, Energy and Environmental Justice.’ Energy Policy., Volume 119, 2018, pp 1-7.

Monica. T & Bronwyn. L., ‘Community Lawyering and Climate Justice: A New Frontier.’ Alternative Law Journal (47) 3 pp 199-203.

Muigua. K., ‘Achieving Sustainable Development, Peace and Environmental Security.’ Glenwood Publishers Limited, 2021.

Muigua. K., ‘Fostering Climate Justice for Sustainable Development.’ Available at https://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Fostering-Climate-Justice-forSustainable- Development.pdf (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

Newell. P., ‘Toward Transformative Climate Justice: An Emerging Research Agenda.’ WIREs Climate Change., Volume 12, Issue 6 (2021).

Oxfam., ‘Climate Justice.’ Available at https://www.oxfam.org.au/what-wedo/climate-justice/ (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

Partnership for Action on Green Economy., ‘Argentina’s Capacity Building on Green Jobs and Just Transition.’ Available at https://www.un-page.org/news/argentinascapacity-building-on-green-jobs-and-just-transition/ (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Ramsey County., ‘On climate justice: Climate Change and Environmental Justice.’ Available at https://www.ramseycounty.us/content/climate-justice-climate-changeand-environmentaljustice#:~:text= Climate%20Justice%20is%20a%20subset,the%20impacts%20of%20cli mate%20change (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

Schlosberg. D & Collins. L., ‘From Environmental to Climate Justice: Climate Change and the Discourse of Environmental Justice.’ WIREs Clim Change, 2014.

Smith. J., ‘Global Climate Justice Activism: “The New Protagonists” and their Projects for a Just Transition.’ Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20190429063257id_/http://dscholarship.pitt.edu/ 35560/1/Smith%20and%20Patterson%20Unequal%20Exchange%20Volume%20New%20Protagonists%2 0DScholarship.pdf (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

Sultana. F., ‘Critical Climate Justice.’ Available at https://www.farhanasultana.com/wp-content/uploads/Sultana-Critical-climatejustice.pdf (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development., ‘A Global Just Transition: Climate and Development Goals in a World of Extreme Inequalities.’ Available at https://unctad.org/system/files/non-officialdocument/UNCTAD_Just_Transition_BACKGROUND _NOTE_COP27.pdf (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs., ‘Forum on Climate Change and Science and Technology Innovation.’ Available at https://www.un.org/en/desa/forum-climatechangeandscience-and-technologyinnovation (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Development Programme., ‘Climate Change is a Matter of Justice – Here’s Why.’ Available at https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-andstories/climate-change-matter-justice-heres-why (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Development Programme., ‘What is just transition? And why is it important?.’ Available at https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/whatjust-transition-and-why-it-important (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Environment Programme., ‘Climate Justice.’ Available at https://leap.unep.org/en/knowledge/glossary/climatejustice#:~:text=Climate%20justice%20is%20a%20term,environmental%20or%20physi cal%20in%20nature. (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Environment Programme., ‘Climate Justice.’ Available at https://leap.unep.org/knowledge/glossary/climate-justice (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Environment Programme., ‘Responding to Climate Change.’ Available at https://www.unep.org/regions/africa/regional-initiatives/responding-climatechange (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change., ‘Financing Fair, Inclusive and Just Transitions to a Sustainable Future.’ Available at https://unfccc.int/news/financing-fair-inclusive-and-just-transitions-to-asustainable-future (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change., ‘Leaving No One Behind in the Transition Towards a Low-Carbon Economy.’ Available at https://unfccc.int/news/leaving-no-one-behind-in-the-transition-towards-a-lowcarbon-economy (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change., ‘Paris Agreement.’ Available at https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change., ‘Views on Different Elements of the Work Programme on Just Transition Pathways Referred to in Paragraph 52 of Decision 1/CMA.4.’ https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionsStaging/Documents/202309181045— ITF_SLOCAT_JTWP%20 submission.pdf (Accessed on 29/11/2023).

United Nations General Assembly., ‘Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.’ 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1.

United Nations., ‘Climate Action.’ Available at https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-action/ (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

United Nations., ‘What is Climate Change?’ Available at https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change (Accessed on 28/11/2023).

Continue Reading

Lawyers

Dr. Paul Ogendi AI Agenda for LSK Upcountry Representative

Published

on

By

Top Law Scholar and Practitioner Dr. Paul Ogendi, in race for LSK Upcountry Representative 2024-2026

Dear Esteemed Members of the Law Society of Kenya,

As your candidate for Up-Country Representative for the term 2024-2026, I am committed to advancing our legal profession and embracing the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI). Here are actionable steps to implement my agenda concerning AI in the legal sector:

1. Education and Awareness:

  • Organize workshops, webinars, and seminars to educate legal practitioners about AI technologies, their applications, and ethical considerations.
  • Collaborate with universities and legal institutions to integrate AI courses into legal education curricula.

2. Research and Development:

  • Establish a task force or committee focused on AI research within the Law Society.
  • Encourage legal professionals to explore AI tools for legal research, document review, and case prediction.
  • Foster partnerships with tech companies and research institutions to develop AI solutions tailored to legal needs.

3. Ethical Guidelines:

  • Develop clear guidelines for the responsible use of AI in legal practice.
  • Address concerns related to bias, transparency, and accountability in AI algorithms.
  • Promote adherence to professional ethics while leveraging AI tools.

4. Automating Routine Tasks:

  • Identify repetitive tasks (such as contract review, due diligence, and legal research) that can be automated using AI.
  • Invest in AI-powered tools to streamline administrative processes, allowing lawyers to focus on complex legal issues.

5. Legal Analytics and Predictive Modeling:

  • Encourage law firms and practitioners to adopt AI-driven analytics platforms.
  • Leverage predictive models to assess case outcomes, identify trends, and make informed decisions.

6. Client Services and Communication:

  • Implement AI chatbots for client inquiries, appointment scheduling, and basic legal advice.
  • Enhance communication channels through AI-driven tools to improve client satisfaction.

7. Data Security and Privacy:

  • Address data protection concerns by ensuring compliance with privacy laws.
  • Collaborate with cybersecurity experts to safeguard sensitive legal information processed by AI systems.

8. Collaboration and Networking:

  • Engage with other legal associations, tech communities, and government bodies to share best practices.
  • Attend AI conferences and forums to stay updated on advancements and network with industry experts.

Remember, our goal is not to replace lawyers but to empower them with AI tools that enhance efficiency, accuracy, and access to justice. Let us embrace this technological evolution while upholding the highest standards of legal practice.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Paul Ogendi,
Up-Country Representative 2024-2026
Law Society of Kenya.

Continue Reading

Trending