By Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, C.Arb, FCIArb is a Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution at the University of Nairobi, Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration, Leading Environmental Law Scholar, Respected Sustainable Development Policy Advisor, Top Natural Resources Lawyer, Highly-Regarded Dispute Resolution Expert and Awardee of the Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) of Kenya by H.E. the President of Republic of Kenya. He is The African ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, The African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, ADR Practitioner of the Year in Kenya 2021, CIArb (Kenya) Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 and ADR Publisher of the Year 2021 and Author of the Kenya’s First ESG Book: Embracing Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) tenets for Sustainable Development” (Glenwood, Nairobi, July 2023) and Kenya’s First Two Climate Change Law Book: Combating Climate Change for Sustainability (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023), Achieving Climate Justice for Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, October 2023) and Promoting Rule of Law for Sustainable Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, January 2024)*
There has been progress towards strengthening ethics in arbitration as envisaged by several codes and institutional rules on ethics. The International Bar Association (IBA) has formulated guidelines on conflicts of interest in international arbitration. The guidelines apply to international commercial arbitration and international investment arbitration and are designed to assist parties, practitioners, arbitrators, institutions and courts in dealing with the fundamental ethical concerns of impartiality and independence.
Among the fundamental principles encapsulated in the guidelines is impartiality and independence. According to the guidelines, every arbitrator shall be impartial and independent of the parties at the time of accepting an appointment to serve and shall remain so until the final award has been rendered or the proceedings have otherwise finally terminated. The guidelines further seek to address the ethical concern of conflict of interest. They require an arbitrator to decline to accept an appointment or, if the arbitration has already been commenced, refuse to continue to act as an arbitrator, if he or she has any doubt as to his or her ability to be impartial or independent. According to the guidelines, the rules on conflict of interest are aimed at fostering confidence in the arbitral process.
The IBA guidelines also envisage the ethical duty of disclosure. They require an arbitrator to disclose any facts or circumstances that may, in the eyes of the parties, give rise to doubts as to his or her impartiality or independence prior to accepting appointment or a soon as the arbitrator becomes aware of such facts or circumstances. The IBA guidelines also govern parties to an arbitration and require them to disclose any relationship, direct or indirect, with the arbitrator. Disclosure of such relationships is aimed at reducing the risk of an unmeritorious challenge of an arbitrator’s impartiality or independence based on information learned after the appointment.
The IBA guidelines are important in strengthening ethics in arbitration by providing specific guidance to arbitrators, parties, institutions and courts as to which situations do or do not constitute conflicts of interest, or should or should not be disclosed. The IBA guidelines represent an attempt to formulate a code of ethics in arbitration at the international level. The guidelines have gained wide acceptance within the international arbitration community.
At the Institutional level, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Code of Professional and Ethical Conduct for Members sets out professional and moral principles to govern the conduct of members of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators while discharging their mandate. The Code requires members to maintain integrity and fairness while managing disputes and withdraw from acting if they can longer fulfill this obligation.
The Code further requires members to disclose all interests, relationships and matters likely to affect their independence and impartiality before and throughout the arbitration process. It also requires members to be competent and only accept appointments to manage disputes only when they are appropriately qualified or experienced. In addition, the Code requires arbitrators to ensure that parties are adequately informed of all the procedural aspects of the arbitration process. It further requires members to maintain trust and confidence of the dispute resolution process. The Code is therefore an important source of professional conduct, ethics, integrity and etiquette for members of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. It governs ethical issues in arbitration including integrity, fairness, conflict of interest, competence, trust and confidence.
The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) has also made progress towards strengthening ethics in arbitration vide its arbitration rules which contain general guidelines for the parties’ legal representatives. This has been described as the first attempt to set out an ethical framework for regulating the conduct of counsel in international arbitration at an institutional level. The guidelines define the standards of ethical conduct expected of counsel appearing before the LCIA or its tribunal.
The guidelines prohibit legal representatives from engaging in certain conduct including activities intended unfairly to obstruct the arbitration or to jeopardise the finality of any award, knowingly making any false statement to the arbitral tribunal or the LCIA Court, knowingly procuring or assisting in the preparation of or relying upon any false evidence, knowingly concealing or assisting in the concealment of any document (or any part thereof) which is ordered to be produced by the arbitral tribunal, and deliberately initiating or attempting to initiate any unilateral contact with a member of the arbitration tribunal in relation to the arbitration proceedings.
These guidelines are binding upon the parties’ legal representatives pursuant to article 18.5 of the LCIA rules. They are aimed at promoting good and ethical conduct for parties’ legal representatives appearing before the LCIA. Further, arbitral institutions in Africa have made progress towards strengthening ethics in arbitration by formulating rules and guidelines to govern ethical conduct in arbitration proceedings.
The Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA) has developed a code of conduct for arbitrators. The Code requires an arbitrator, when approached with an appointment, to conduct reasonable enquiries with regard to potential conflict of interest that may arise from his or her appointment for that particular matter that may affect impartiality and independence. It requires an arbitrator to accept appointment only where certain requirements have been met. This is where an arbitrator is fully satisfied that he is independent of the parties at the time of the appointment, and is able to remain so until final award has been rendered, able to discharge his duties without bias, has adequate knowledge of the language of the proceedings, has adequate experience and ability for the case at hand, and is able to give to the proceedings the time and attention which parties are reasonably entitled to expect.
The Code also requires arbitrators to conduct proceedings with integrity and fairness61. Arbitrators are also required to disclose any interest or relationship that affects impartiality or creates an unfavorable appearance of partiality or bias. The Code is also aimed at fostering appropriateness in communication between the tribunal and parties. It forbids an arbitrator from discussing the case with any party in the absence of the other party.
The Code also safeguards the ethical requirements of honesty, trust and confidentiality and requires arbitrators to keep confidential all matters relating to the proceedings. Further, it requires arbitrators to make their decisions in a just, independent and deliberate manner. The Code also aims at strengthening ethics in terms of fees charged by arbitrators and requires them to adopt and adhere to the NCIA Schedule of Fees. The NCIA Code of Conduct for Arbitrators is therefore vital in strengthening ethics in arbitration. It requires arbitrators to observe fundamental standards of ethical conduct.
The Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa has also designed a Code of Conduct that stipulates ethical principles and standards to govern arbitrators. The Code requires an arbitrator to always discharge his or her duties in such manner as to ensure a fair administration of justice between the parties. Further, it requires an arbitrator to only accept appointment where the arbitrator is satisfied that he or she can act impartially and independently in that matter and disclose any matter that impair the ability to act independently and impartially.
The Code also stipulates the ethical duty of an arbitrator to act diligently and efficiently, and always with due courtesy to the parties and their witnesses. Further, it enshrines the duty of confidentiality and requires the arbitrator to ensure that the proceedings remain confidential unless the parties agree otherwise. The Code also envisages the ethical duty of an arbitrator to ensure efficient management of disputes and requires an arbitrator to devote sufficient time and proper attention to the matter and employ procedures which avoid unnecessary cost or delay and which promote the efficient management of disputes.
The Kigali International Arbitration Centre vide its arbitration rules also aims at strengthening ethical practice in arbitration. The rules require an arbitrator to be and remain at all times independent and impartial and not act as the advocate of the parties. The rules further require the Centre, in confirming or appointing arbitrators, to have due regard to any qualifications required of an arbitrator by the agreement of the parties and to such consideration as are likely to secure an impartial and independent arbitrator. They also require the Centre to consider whether the arbitrator has sufficient availability and ability to determine the case in a prompt and efficient manner appropriate to the nature of arbitration.
Before appointment or confirmation, a prospective arbitrator is required to sign a statement of acceptance, availability, impartiality and independence. The arbitrator is also required to disclose to the Centre any facts or circumstances that may give rise to justifiable doubts as to his or her impartiality. Where these ethical requirements have not been met, the rules allow parties to challenge the appointment of an arbitrator if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence or if the arbitrator does not possess any requisite qualification on which the parties have agreed.
*This is an extract from the Book: Promoting Rule of Law for Sustainable Development (Glenwood, Nairobi, January 2024) by Hon. Prof. Kariuki Muigua, OGW, PhD, Professor of Environmental Law and Dispute Resolution, Senior Advocate of Kenya, Chartered Arbitrator, Kenya’s ADR Practitioner of the Year 2021 (Nairobi Legal Awards), ADR Lifetime Achievement Award 2021 (CIArb Kenya), African Arbitrator of the Year 2022, Africa ADR Practitioner of the Year 2022, Member of National Environment Tribunal (NET) Emeritus (2017 to 2023) and Member of Permanent Court of Arbitration nominated by Republic of Kenya. Prof. Kariuki Muigua is a foremost Environmental Law and Natural Resources Lawyer and Scholar, Sustainable Development Advocate and Conflict Management Expert in Kenya. Prof. Kariuki Muigua teaches Environmental Law and Dispute resolution at the University of Nairobi School of Law, The Center for Advanced Studies in Environmental Law and Policy (CASELAP) and Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies. He has published numerous books and articles on Environmental Law, Environmental Justice Conflict Management, Alternative Dispute Resolution and Sustainable Development. Prof. Muigua is also a Chartered Arbitrator, an Accredited Mediator, the Managing Partner of Kariuki Muigua & Co. Advocates and Africa Trustee Emeritus of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2019-2022. Prof. Muigua is a 2023 recipient of President of the Republic of Kenya Order of Grand Warrior (OGW) Award for his service to the Nation as a Distinguished Expert, Academic and Scholar in Dispute Resolution and recognized among the top 5 leading lawyers and dispute resolution experts in Band 1 in Kenya by the Chambers Global Guide 2022 and was listed in the Inaugural THE LAWYER AFRICA Litigation Hall of Fame 2023 as one of the Top 50 Most Distinguished Litigation Lawyers in Kenya and the Top Arbitrator in Kenya in 2023.
References
Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa., ‘Code of Conduct.’ Available at https://arbitration.co.za/domestic-arbitration/code-of-conduct/ (Accessed on 12/10/2023).
Chartered Institute of Arbitrators., ‘Code of Professional and Ethical Conduct for Members.’ Available at https://www.ciarb.org/media/4231/ciarb-code-of-professional-andethical-conduct-for-members.pdf (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Constitution of Kenya, 2010, Article 159 (2) (c), Government Printer, Nairobi.
Dattilo. V., ‘Ethics in International Arbitration: A Critical Examination of the LCIA General Guidelines for the Parties’ Legal Representatives.’ Available at https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2369&context=gjicl (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Harding. K., ‘Arbitration – The Role of Ethics and its Nature.’ Available at https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Arbitration:+The+International+Journal+of+Arbitration,+ Mediation+and+Dispute+Management/64.3/AMDM1998013 (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
International Bar Association., ‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration.’ Available at https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=e2fe5e72-eb14-4bba-b10d-d33dafee8918 (Accessed on 12/10/2023).
Kigali International Arbitration Centre., ‘Arbitration Rules, 2012.’ Available at https://kiac.org.rw/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/KIAC-arbitration-rules.pdf (Accessed on 12/10/2023).
London Court of International Arbitration., ‘LCIA Arbitration Rules 2020.’ Available at https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Meadow. C., ‘Ethics in ADR: The Many “Cs” of Professional Responsibility and Dispute Resolution’ 28 Fordham Urb. L.J. 979-990 (2001).
Meadow. C., ‘Ethics Issues in Arbitration and Related Dispute Resolution Processes: What’s Happening and What’s Not.’ University of Miami Law Review, Volume 56, N0. 4 (2002).
Moses, ‘The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration’ 2nd Edition, 2017, Cambridge University Press.
Muigua. K & Kariuki. F., ‘ADR, Access to Justice and Development in Kenya.’ Available at http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ADR-access-to-justice-anddevelopment-inKenyaSTRATHMORE-CONFERENCE-PRESENTATION.pdf (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Muigua. K., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and Access to Justice in Kenya.’ Glenwood Publishers Limited, 2015.
Muigua. K., ‘Promoting International Commercial Arbitration in Africa.’ Available at http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/PROMOTING-INTERNATIONALCOMMERCIAL ARBITRATION-IN-AFRICA.pdf (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Muigua. K., ‘Promoting Professional Conduct, Ethics, Integrity & Etiquette in ADR.’ Available at http://kmco.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/PromotingProfessionalConduct-Ethics-Integrity-Etiquette-in-ADR.pdf (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Muigua. K., ‘Resolving Conflicts through Mediation in Kenya.’ Glenwood Publishers Limited, 2nd Edition, 2017.
Muigua. K., ‘Settling Disputes through Arbitration in Kenya.’ Glenwood Publishers, 4th Edition, 2022.
Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration., ‘Code of Conduct for Arbitrators, 2021.’ Available at https://ncia.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/3.-NCIACODE-OF-CONDUCT-FOR-ARBITRATORS-2021.pdf (Accessed on 12/10/2023).
Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration., ‘Confidentiality in Arbitration: Evaluating Legal and Ethical Dilemmas.’ Available at https://ncia.or.ke/wpcontent/uploads/2022/10/Confidentiality-in-Arbitration-Evaluating-Legal-andEthical-Dilemmas-1.pdf (Accessed on 12/10/2023).
Rajoo. D., ‘Importance of Arbitrators’ Ethics and Integrity in Ensuring Quality Arbitrations.’ Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp 329-347 (2013).
Ripley-Evans. J., & De Sousa. M., ‘2022 SOA Arbitration in Africa Survey Reveals a Thriving Market for Arbitration on the Continent.’ Available at https://hsfnotes.com/africa/2022/11/25/2022-soas-arbitration-in-africa-survey-reveals-athriving-market-for-arbitration-on-the-continent/ (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
Rogers. C., ‘The Ethics of International Arbitrators.’ Available at https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/wp-content/uploads/InternationalArbitration-Doctrine-49international_arbitration.pdf (Accessed on 11/10/2023).
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law., ‘Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.’ (New York, 1958).
United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS XVI.
World Intellectual Property Organization., ‘What is Arbitration’ Available at https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/what-is-arb.html (Accessed on 11/10/2023).’